Fujifilm X-T10 vs Olympus E-M5 III
83 Imaging
59 Features
81 Overall
67
80 Imaging
62 Features
88 Overall
72
Fujifilm X-T10 vs Olympus E-M5 III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 51000
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Fujifilm X Mount
- 381g - 118 x 83 x 41mm
- Announced May 2015
- Later Model is Fujifilm X-T20
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 414g - 125 x 85 x 50mm
- Introduced October 2019
- Old Model is Olympus E-M5 II
- Updated by OM System OM-5
Fujifilm X-T10 vs Olympus E-M5 III Overview
Following is a thorough comparison of the Fujifilm X-T10 versus Olympus E-M5 III, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by rivals FujiFilm and Olympus. The resolution of the Fujifilm X-T10 (16MP) and the E-M5 III (20MP) is pretty well matched but the Fujifilm X-T10 (APS-C) and E-M5 III (Four Thirds) come with totally different sensor dimensions.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe Fujifilm X-T10 was manufactured 5 years earlier than the E-M5 III which is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (SLR-style mirrorless).
Before getting straight into a full comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the Fujifilm X-T10 matches up against the E-M5 III when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Fujifilm X-T10 vs Olympus E-M5 III Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm X-T10 and Olympus OM-D E-M5 III. The entire galleries are provided at Fujifilm X-T10 Gallery and Olympus E-M5 III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-T10 over the Olympus E-M5 III
Fujifilm X-T10 | E-M5 III |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 III over the Fujifilm X-T10
E-M5 III | Fujifilm X-T10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | October 2019 | May 2015 | More modern by 53 months | |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen resolution | 1040k | 920k | Clearer screen (+120k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Fujifilm X-T10 and Olympus E-M5 III
Fujifilm X-T10 | E-M5 III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More precise focusing | |||
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen sizing |
Fujifilm X-T10 vs Olympus E-M5 III Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry around your camera often, you should factor its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm X-T10 offers outer dimensions of 118mm x 83mm x 41mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 1.6") having a weight of 381 grams (0.84 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-M5 III has dimensions of 125mm x 85mm x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") accompanied by a weight of 414 grams (0.91 lbs).
Analyze the Fujifilm X-T10 versus Olympus E-M5 III in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Below is the front view measurements comparison of the Fujifilm X-T10 compared to the E-M5 III.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm X-T10 and E-M5 III is 83 and 80 respectively.
Fujifilm X-T10 vs Olympus E-M5 III Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its tough to see the contrast between sensor sizes simply by checking technical specs. The image underneath might offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm X-T10 and E-M5 III.
As you have seen, each of the cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The Fujifilm X-T10 because of its bigger sensor will make achieving shallower DOF simpler and the Olympus E-M5 III will resolve more detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop pictures far more aggressively. The more aged Fujifilm X-T10 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Fujifilm X-T10 vs Olympus E-M5 III Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Fujifilm X-T10 vs Olympus E-M5 III Specifications
Fujifilm X-T10 | Olympus OM-D E-M5 III | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | FujiFilm | Olympus |
Model | Fujifilm X-T10 | Olympus OM-D E-M5 III |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Announced | 2015-05-19 | 2019-10-17 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | EXR Processor II | TruePic VIII |
Sensor type | CMOS X-TRANS II | MOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 23.6 x 15.6mm | 17.4 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 368.2mm² | 226.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 20MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4896 x 3264 | 5184 x 3888 |
Maximum native ISO | 51000 | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW format | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | - | 64 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 77 | 121 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Fujifilm X | Micro Four Thirds |
Total lenses | 54 | 107 |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Tilting | Fully Articulated |
Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 920 thousand dots | 1,040 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | 2,360 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | 0.68x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 60 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
Highest quiet shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | 1/32000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 8.0fps | 30.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 5.00 m (ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, forced flash, slow synchro, flash off, rear-curtain synchro, commander | Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/250 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p, 24p) | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 4096x2160 |
Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Optional | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 381 grams (0.84 lb) | 414 grams (0.91 lb) |
Dimensions | 118 x 83 x 41mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 1.6") | 125 x 85 x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 pictures | 310 pictures |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-W126 | BLN-1 |
Self timer | Yes (10sec. / 2sec. Delay) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD / SDHC / SDXC (UHS-I) | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $800 | $1,199 |