Fujifilm X-T20 vs Olympus E-M5 III
83 Imaging
67 Features
82 Overall
73
80 Imaging
61 Features
88 Overall
71
Fujifilm X-T20 vs Olympus E-M5 III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 12800 (Boost to 51200)
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Fujifilm X Mount
- 383g - 118 x 83 x 41mm
- Announced January 2017
- Succeeded the Fujifilm X-T10
- Updated by Fujifilm X-T30
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 414g - 125 x 85 x 50mm
- Revealed October 2019
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M5 II
- Successor is OM System OM-5
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Fujifilm X-T20 vs Olympus E-M5 III Overview
The following is a detailed assessment of the Fujifilm X-T20 vs Olympus E-M5 III, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by rivals FujiFilm and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm X-T20 (24MP) and the E-M5 III (20MP) is pretty close but the Fujifilm X-T20 (APS-C) and E-M5 III (Four Thirds) offer different sensor measurements.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe Fujifilm X-T20 was brought out 3 years earlier than the E-M5 III which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras have the same body design (SLR-style mirrorless).
Before diving straight to a full comparison, here is a simple summation of how the Fujifilm X-T20 matches up vs the E-M5 III in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Fujifilm X-T20 vs Olympus E-M5 III Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm X-T20 & Olympus OM-D E-M5 III. The entire galleries are viewable at Fujifilm X-T20 Gallery & Olympus E-M5 III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-T20 over the Olympus E-M5 III
| Fujifilm X-T20 | E-M5 III |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 III over the Fujifilm X-T20
| E-M5 III | Fujifilm X-T20 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | October 2019 | January 2017 | Newer by 33 months | |
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen | |
| Screen resolution | 1040k | 920k | Sharper screen (+120k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Common features in the Fujifilm X-T20 and Olympus E-M5 III
| Fujifilm X-T20 | E-M5 III | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | More accurate focusing | |||
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen measurements | |
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Fujifilm X-T20 vs Olympus E-M5 III Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to travel with your camera often, you need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm X-T20 provides exterior measurements of 118mm x 83mm x 41mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 1.6") having a weight of 383 grams (0.84 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-M5 III has dimensions of 125mm x 85mm x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") accompanied by a weight of 414 grams (0.91 lbs).
Examine the Fujifilm X-T20 vs Olympus E-M5 III in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have at that moment. Here is a front view overall size comparison of the Fujifilm X-T20 against the E-M5 III.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm X-T20 and E-M5 III is 83 and 80 respectively.
Fujifilm X-T20 vs Olympus E-M5 III Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its hard to imagine the contrast in sensor dimensions just by viewing technical specs. The pic below will help offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm X-T20 and E-M5 III.
As you can tell, the two cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The Fujifilm X-T20 because of its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field simpler and the Fujifilm X-T20 will provide you with greater detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The more aged Fujifilm X-T20 will be behind in sensor technology.
Fujifilm X-T20 vs Olympus E-M5 III Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Fujifilm X-T20 vs Olympus E-M5 III Specifications
| Fujifilm X-T20 | Olympus OM-D E-M5 III | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model type | Fujifilm X-T20 | Olympus OM-D E-M5 III |
| Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
| Announced | 2017-01-18 | 2019-10-17 |
| Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | X-Processor Pro2 | TruePic VIII |
| Sensor type | CMOS X-TRANS III | MOS |
| Sensor size | APS-C | Four Thirds |
| Sensor dimensions | 23.6 x 15.6mm | 17.4 x 13mm |
| Sensor area | 368.2mm² | 226.2mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 24 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Max native ISO | 12800 | 25600 |
| Max boosted ISO | 51200 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 200 | 200 |
| RAW images | ||
| Minimum boosted ISO | 100 | 64 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | 325 | 121 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Fujifilm X | Micro Four Thirds |
| Number of lenses | 54 | 107 |
| Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Tilting | Fully Articulated |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 920k dot | 1,040k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | 2,360k dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | 0.68x |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
| Maximum quiet shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | 1/32000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 14.0 frames/s | 30.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.00 m (ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | Auto, forced flash, slow synchro, flash off, rear-curtain synchro, commander | Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash sync | 1/180 seconds | 1/250 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 (29.97p, 25p, 24p, 23.98p), 1920 x 1080 (59.94p, 50p, 29.97p, 25p, 24p, 23.98p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p) | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 4096x2160 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Optional | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 383 grams (0.84 lb) | 414 grams (0.91 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 118 x 83 x 41mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 1.6") | 125 x 85 x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 pictures | 310 pictures |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-W126S | BLN-1 |
| Self timer | Yes (10sec. / 2sec. Delay) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD / SDHC / SDXC (UHS-II compatible) | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $900 | $1,199 |