Fujifilm X-T20 vs Olympus E-PM2
83 Imaging
67 Features
82 Overall
73


89 Imaging
52 Features
63 Overall
56
Fujifilm X-T20 vs Olympus E-PM2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 12800 (Increase to 51200)
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Fujifilm X Mount
- 383g - 118 x 83 x 41mm
- Announced January 2017
- Earlier Model is Fujifilm X-T10
- Replacement is Fujifilm X-T30
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 269g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
- Launched May 2013
- Superseded the Olympus E-PM1

Fujifilm X-T20 vs Olympus E-PM2 Overview
In this write-up, we will be analyzing the Fujifilm X-T20 and Olympus E-PM2, both Entry-Level Mirrorless digital cameras by competitors FujiFilm and Olympus. There exists a big gap between the resolutions of the Fujifilm X-T20 (24MP) and E-PM2 (16MP) and the Fujifilm X-T20 (APS-C) and E-PM2 (Four Thirds) feature totally different sensor measurements.

The Fujifilm X-T20 was released 3 years later than the E-PM2 and that is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Fujifilm X-T20 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus E-PM2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving through a thorough comparison, below is a quick view of how the Fujifilm X-T20 grades versus the E-PM2 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Fujifilm X-T20 vs Olympus E-PM2 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm X-T20 and Olympus PEN E-PM2. The complete galleries are viewable at Fujifilm X-T20 Gallery and Olympus E-PM2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-T20 over the Olympus E-PM2
Fujifilm X-T20 | E-PM2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2017 | ![]() | May 2013 | More recent by 45 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 460k | Sharper screen (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM2 over the Fujifilm X-T20
E-PM2 | Fujifilm X-T20 |
---|
Common features in the Fujifilm X-T20 and Olympus E-PM2
Fujifilm X-T20 | E-PM2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very exact focusing | ||
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen measurements |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Fujifilm X-T20 vs Olympus E-PM2 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to lug around your camera regularly, you have to think about its weight and size. The Fujifilm X-T20 provides exterior measurements of 118mm x 83mm x 41mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 1.6") with a weight of 383 grams (0.84 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-PM2 has specifications of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs).
Contrast the Fujifilm X-T20 and Olympus E-PM2 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have attached during that time. Following is the front view sizing comparison of the Fujifilm X-T20 and the E-PM2.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm X-T20 and E-PM2 is 83 and 89 respectively.

Fujifilm X-T20 vs Olympus E-PM2 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's difficult to visualise the difference between sensor measurements merely by checking a spec sheet. The photograph below should give you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm X-T20 and E-PM2.
As you can see, the 2 cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The Fujifilm X-T20 due to its bigger sensor will make getting shallow DOF less difficult and the Fujifilm X-T20 will give extra detail as a result of its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop photographs a little more aggressively. The more recent Fujifilm X-T20 is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.

Fujifilm X-T20 vs Olympus E-PM2 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm X-T20 vs Olympus E-PM2 Specifications
Fujifilm X-T20 | Olympus PEN E-PM2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | FujiFilm | Olympus |
Model type | Fujifilm X-T20 | Olympus PEN E-PM2 |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Announced | 2017-01-18 | 2013-05-21 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | X-Processor Pro2 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS X-TRANS III | CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 23.6 x 15.6mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 368.2mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Highest Possible resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 25600 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | 51200 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 200 |
RAW support | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 325 | 35 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Fujifilm X | Micro Four Thirds |
Number of lenses | 54 | 107 |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 920k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 30s | 60s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Fastest silent shutter speed | 1/32000s | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 14.0 frames per sec | 8.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.00 m (ISO 100) | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) |
Flash modes | Auto, forced flash, slow synchro, flash off, rear-curtain synchro, commander | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/180s | 1/250s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 (29.97p, 25p, 24p, 23.98p), 1920 x 1080 (59.94p, 50p, 29.97p, 25p, 24p, 23.98p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Optional | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 383 grams (0.84 pounds) | 269 grams (0.59 pounds) |
Dimensions | 118 x 83 x 41mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 1.6") | 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 72 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.7 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.2 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 932 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 pictures | 360 pictures |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-W126S | BLS-5 |
Self timer | Yes (10sec. / 2sec. Delay) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD / SDHC / SDXC (UHS-II compatible) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at release | $900 | $448 |