Fujifilm X-T200 vs Kodak Z915
80 Imaging
70 Features
87 Overall
76
91 Imaging
33 Features
18 Overall
27
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Kodak Z915 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.5" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 12800 (Bump to 51200)
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Fujifilm X Mount
- 370g - 121 x 84 x 55mm
- Revealed January 2020
- Old Model is Fujifilm X-T100
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-350mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 194g - 90 x 64 x 39mm
- Revealed January 2009
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Kodak Z915 Overview
On this page, we are analyzing the Fujifilm X-T200 vs Kodak Z915, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands FujiFilm and Kodak. There exists a sizeable gap among the image resolutions of the Fujifilm X-T200 (24MP) and Z915 (10MP) and the Fujifilm X-T200 (APS-C) and Z915 (1/2.3") have different sensor measurements.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingThe Fujifilm X-T200 was launched 11 years later than the Z915 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Fujifilm X-T200 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Kodak Z915 being a Compact camera.
Before diving right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the Fujifilm X-T200 grades against the Z915 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Kodak Z915 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm X-T200 and Kodak EasyShare Z915. The complete galleries are viewable at Fujifilm X-T200 Gallery and Kodak Z915 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-T200 over the Kodak Z915
Fujifilm X-T200 | Z915 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2020 | January 2009 | More recent by 135 months | |
Focus manually | Very precise focusing | |||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display dimensions | 3.5" | 2.5" | Larger display (+1") | |
Display resolution | 2780k | 230k | Clearer display (+2550k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Kodak Z915 over the Fujifilm X-T200
Z915 | Fujifilm X-T200 |
---|
Common features in the Fujifilm X-T200 and Kodak Z915
Fujifilm X-T200 | Z915 |
---|
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Kodak Z915 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you need to consider its weight and size. The Fujifilm X-T200 enjoys outer dimensions of 121mm x 84mm x 55mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.2") with a weight of 370 grams (0.82 lbs) whilst the Kodak Z915 has specifications of 90mm x 64mm x 39mm (3.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") along with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Check the Fujifilm X-T200 vs Kodak Z915 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are utilising during that time. Below is a front view size comparison of the Fujifilm X-T200 versus the Z915.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm X-T200 and Z915 is 80 and 91 respectively.
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Kodak Z915 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's difficult to visualize the difference in sensor measurements simply by researching a spec sheet. The photograph underneath will provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm X-T200 and Z915.
Clearly, each of these cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The Fujifilm X-T200 featuring a larger sensor is going to make shooting bokeh less difficult and the Fujifilm X-T200 will provide you with greater detail utilizing its extra 14MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop images a bit more aggressively. The more recent Fujifilm X-T200 provides an edge in sensor innovation.
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Kodak Z915 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Kodak Z915 Specifications
Fujifilm X-T200 | Kodak EasyShare Z915 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | FujiFilm | Kodak |
Model | Fujifilm X-T200 | Kodak EasyShare Z915 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2020-01-22 | 2009-01-08 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 23.5 x 15.7mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 369.0mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
Max boosted ISO | 51200 | - |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Min boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 425 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Fujifilm X | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 35-350mm (10.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.5-4.8 |
Macro focus range | - | 10cm |
Number of lenses | 54 | - |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3.5" | 2.5" |
Screen resolution | 2,780k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 16 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1250 secs |
Maximum silent shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.0fps | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 7.00 m (at ISO 200) | 5.80 m |
Flash settings | - | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 120p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 640x480 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 370g (0.82 pounds) | 194g (0.43 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 121 x 84 x 55mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.2") | 90 x 64 x 39mm (3.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 270 pictures | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NP-W126S | 2 x AA |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $699 | $200 |