Fujifilm X-T30 vs Olympus VR-320
82 Imaging
71 Features
84 Overall
76
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
Fujifilm X-T30 vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 26MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 160 - 12800 (Expand to 51200)
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Fujifilm X Mount
- 383g - 118 x 83 x 47mm
- Launched February 2019
- Earlier Model is Fujifilm X-T20
- Refreshed by Fujifilm X-T30 II
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Introduced July 2011
- Successor is Olympus VR-330
Fujifilm X-T30 vs Olympus VR-320 Overview
Its time to look a bit more closely at the Fujifilm X-T30 and Olympus VR-320, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies FujiFilm and Olympus. There exists a big gap between the image resolutions of the Fujifilm X-T30 (26MP) and VR-320 (14MP) and the Fujifilm X-T30 (APS-C) and VR-320 (1/2.3") have different sensor measurements.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe Fujifilm X-T30 was released 7 years later than the VR-320 and that is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Fujifilm X-T30 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus VR-320 being a Compact camera.
Before diving right into a detailed comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the Fujifilm X-T30 scores versus the VR-320 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Fujifilm X-T30 vs Olympus VR-320 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm X-T30 and Olympus VR-320. The complete galleries are provided at Fujifilm X-T30 Gallery and Olympus VR-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-T30 over the Olympus VR-320
Fujifilm X-T30 | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2019 | July 2011 | Fresher by 93 months | |
Manual focus | Very exact focusing | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen resolution | 1040k | 230k | Clearer screen (+810k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Fujifilm X-T30
VR-320 | Fujifilm X-T30 |
---|
Common features in the Fujifilm X-T30 and Olympus VR-320
Fujifilm X-T30 | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen measurements | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen |
Fujifilm X-T30 vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to carry your camera often, you are going to need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm X-T30 enjoys exterior measurements of 118mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 1.9") having a weight of 383 grams (0.84 lbs) whilst the Olympus VR-320 has proportions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Examine the Fujifilm X-T30 and Olympus VR-320 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you use at that time. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the Fujifilm X-T30 compared to the VR-320.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm X-T30 and VR-320 is 82 and 94 respectively.
Fujifilm X-T30 vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its hard to imagine the contrast between sensor sizing just by reading specifications. The graphic below should give you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm X-T30 and VR-320.
To sum up, both of these cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The Fujifilm X-T30 due to its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF simpler and the Fujifilm X-T30 will offer extra detail as a result of its extra 12 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop shots way more aggressively. The more recent Fujifilm X-T30 should have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
Fujifilm X-T30 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Fujifilm X-T30 vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications
Fujifilm X-T30 | Olympus VR-320 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Olympus |
Model type | Fujifilm X-T30 | Olympus VR-320 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2019-02-14 | 2011-07-19 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | X-Processor 4 | TruePic III |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 366.6mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 26 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Highest resolution | 6240 x 4160 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
Highest boosted ISO | 51200 | - |
Min native ISO | 160 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Min boosted ISO | 80 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | 425 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Fujifilm X | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.0-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 54 | - |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 1,040k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Highest quiet shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 20.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.00 m (at ISO 100) | 4.70 m |
Flash modes | Auto, on, slow sync, manual, commander | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 30p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.1 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 383 grams (0.84 lb) | 158 grams (0.35 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 118 x 83 x 47mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 380 pictures | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | NP-W126S | LI-42B |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported) | SD/SDHC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $899 | $179 |