Clicky

Fujifilm X20 vs Olympus VR-320

Portability
83
Imaging
38
Features
59
Overall
46
Fujifilm X20 front
 
Olympus VR-320 front
Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
35
Overall
36

Fujifilm X20 vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs

Fujifilm X20
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 2/3" Sensor
  • 2.8" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-112mm (F2.0-2.8) lens
  • 353g - 117 x 70 x 57mm
  • Introduced April 2013
  • Superseded the Fujifilm X10
  • Later Model is Fujifilm X30
Olympus VR-320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
  • Announced July 2011
  • Renewed by Olympus VR-330
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Fujifilm X20 vs Olympus VR-320 Overview

Its time to look a bit more in depth at the Fujifilm X20 versus Olympus VR-320, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals FujiFilm and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm X20 (12MP) and the VR-320 (14MP) is pretty comparable but the Fujifilm X20 (2/3") and VR-320 (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor size.

Photography Glossary

The Fujifilm X20 was manufactured 22 months after the VR-320 which makes them a generation away from one another. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before getting straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a short view of how the Fujifilm X20 scores vs the VR-320 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Fujifilm X20 over the Olympus VR-320

 Fujifilm X20 VR-320 
AnnouncedApril 2013July 2011Newer by 22 months
Focus manually Dial exact focusing
Screen resolution460k230kClearer screen (+230k dot)

Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Fujifilm X20

 VR-320 Fujifilm X20 
Screen size3"2.8"Bigger screen (+0.2")

Common features in the Fujifilm X20 and Olympus VR-320

 Fujifilm X20 VR-320 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen
Touch screen No Touch screen

Fujifilm X20 vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison

When you are planning to travel with your camera, you should factor its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm X20 provides external measurements of 117mm x 70mm x 57mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 2.2") accompanied by a weight of 353 grams (0.78 lbs) and the Olympus VR-320 has measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).

Compare the Fujifilm X20 versus Olympus VR-320 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are working with during that time. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the Fujifilm X20 compared to the VR-320.

Fujifilm X20 vs Olympus VR-320 size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm X20 and VR-320 is 83 and 94 respectively.

Fujifilm X20 vs Olympus VR-320 top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm X20 vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison

Normally, it's difficult to envision the difference in sensor dimensions simply by checking out technical specs. The picture underneath will offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm X20 and VR-320.

As you have seen, the 2 cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The Fujifilm X20 featuring a bigger sensor will make achieving shallower DOF less difficult and the Olympus VR-320 will provide greater detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The more recent Fujifilm X20 will have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.

Fujifilm X20 vs Olympus VR-320 sensor size comparison

Fujifilm X20 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm X20 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Fujifilm X20 Portrait photography information
Olympus VR-320 Portrait photography information
46
focusing manually
great flash sync speed (1/1,000s)
saves RAW files
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (2/3")
33
megapixel count decent (14MP)
supports face detection focus
no manual focus
manual mode not available
can't use external flash
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Fujifilm X20 Street photography features
Olympus VR-320 Street photography features
58
image stabilization (Optical)
saves RAW files
no moving screen
sensor size is very small (2/3")
heavier than average (353g)
62
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition in class (158g)
fixed screen
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Fujifilm X20 Sports photography features
Olympus VR-320 Sports photography features
52
image stabilization (Optical)
offers tracking autofocus
better than average battery (270 per charge)
sensor has phase detect autofocus
sensor resolution low (12MP)
sensor size is very small (2/3")
47
excellent zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (14MP)
supports tracking autofocus
no shutter priority
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Fujifilm X20
Travel photography with Olympus VR-320
60
better than average battery (270 shots)
has built in flash
fairly wide (28mm)
very good max aperture (f2.0)
missing Time Lapse recording
heavier than average (353g)
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
70
lighter than competition in class (158 grams)
megapixel count decent (14MP)
has built in flash
rather wide (24mm)
very long reach (300mm)
does not have Timelapse mode
screen is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Fujifilm X20 Landscape photography highlights
Olympus VR-320 Landscape photography highlights
55
focusing manually
fairly wide (28mm)
very good max aperture (f2.0)
screen is a good size (2.8 inches)
image stabilization (Optical)
saves RAW files
better than average battery (270 per charge)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sensor resolution low (12MP)
sensor size is very small (2/3")
missing Time Lapse recording
42
rather wide (24mm)
screen is a decent size (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (14MP)
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
manual mode not available
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
does not have Timelapse mode
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm X20 Vlogging information
Olympus VR-320 Vlogging information
31
fairly wide (28mm)
very good max aperture (f2.0)
image stabilization (Optical)
high video quality (1920 x 1080 pxls)
display isn't selfie friendly
missing external mic port
heavier than average (353g)
32
rather wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detection focus
lighter than competition in class (158g)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
screen is not selfie friendly
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pixels)
does not have external microphone jack
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Fujifilm X20 vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm X20 and Olympus VR-320
 Fujifilm X20Olympus VR-320
General Information
Company FujiFilm Olympus
Model type Fujifilm X20 Olympus VR-320
Class Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Superzoom
Introduced 2013-04-29 2011-07-19
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Chip EXR Processor II TruePic III
Sensor type CMOS X-TRANS II CCD
Sensor size 2/3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 8.8 x 6.6mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 58.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3
Full resolution 4000 x 3000 4288 x 3216
Max native ISO 12800 1600
Min native ISO 100 80
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch to focus
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-112mm (4.0x) 24-300mm (12.5x)
Maximal aperture f/2.0-2.8 f/3.0-5.9
Macro focusing range 1cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 4.1 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.8" 3"
Resolution of screen 460k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Screen tech TFT color LCD monitor TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (tunnel) None
Viewfinder coverage 85 percent -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 30s 4s
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000s 1/2000s
Continuous shooting speed 12.0fps -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 7.00 m 4.70 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Maximum flash sync 1/1000s -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Max video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video data format H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 353 grams (0.78 lb) 158 grams (0.35 lb)
Physical dimensions 117 x 70 x 57mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 2.2") 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 270 images -
Battery format Battery Pack -
Battery ID NP-50 LI-42B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC
Storage slots One One
Launch pricing $500 $179