Fujifilm X20 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV
83 Imaging
38 Features
59 Overall
46
92 Imaging
35 Features
47 Overall
39
Fujifilm X20 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 2/3" Sensor
- 2.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F2.0-2.8) lens
- 353g - 117 x 70 x 57mm
- Announced April 2013
- Superseded the Fujifilm X10
- Renewed by Fujifilm X30
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
- Revealed September 2011
- Earlier Model is Ricoh GR Digital III
Fujifilm X20 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Overview
Below is a complete comparison of the Fujifilm X20 versus Ricoh GR Digital IV, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by manufacturers FujiFilm and Ricoh. The image resolution of the Fujifilm X20 (12MP) and the GR Digital IV (10MP) is pretty well matched but the Fujifilm X20 (2/3") and GR Digital IV (1/1.7") posses different sensor sizing.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe Fujifilm X20 was launched 20 months later than the GR Digital IV which makes them a generation apart from one another. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting into a in depth comparison, here is a brief summary of how the Fujifilm X20 grades vs the GR Digital IV with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Fujifilm X20 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm X20 and Ricoh GR Digital IV. The complete galleries are viewable at Fujifilm X20 Gallery and Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X20 over the Ricoh GR Digital IV
Fujifilm X20 | GR Digital IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | April 2013 | September 2011 | More recent by 20 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Fujifilm X20
GR Digital IV | Fujifilm X20 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen size | 3" | 2.8" | Bigger screen (+0.2") | |
Screen resolution | 1230k | 460k | Clearer screen (+770k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm X20 and Ricoh GR Digital IV
Fujifilm X20 | GR Digital IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very precise focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Lacking Touch screen |
Fujifilm X20 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to lug around your camera often, you need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm X20 has got external dimensions of 117mm x 70mm x 57mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 2.2") having a weight of 353 grams (0.78 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GR Digital IV has measurements of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Analyze the Fujifilm X20 versus Ricoh GR Digital IV in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are employing at the time. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the Fujifilm X20 compared to the GR Digital IV.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm X20 and GR Digital IV is 83 and 92 respectively.
Fujifilm X20 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very difficult to picture the gap between sensor measurements merely by looking at technical specs. The photograph underneath will help provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm X20 and GR Digital IV.
As you can tell, each of these cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The Fujifilm X20 featuring a bigger sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field easier and the Fujifilm X20 will give you more detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop shots way more aggressively. The younger Fujifilm X20 should have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
Fujifilm X20 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Fujifilm X20 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Specifications
Fujifilm X20 | Ricoh GR Digital IV | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | FujiFilm | Ricoh |
Model type | Fujifilm X20 | Ricoh GR Digital IV |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2013-04-29 | 2011-09-15 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | EXR Processor II | - |
Sensor type | CMOS X-TRANS II | CCD |
Sensor size | 2/3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 8.8 x 6.6mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 58.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.0-2.8 | f/1.9 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 4.1 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.8 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dots | 1,230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (tunnel) | Optical (optional) |
Viewfinder coverage | 85% | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 1 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 12.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.00 m | 3.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/1000 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 353 gr (0.78 pounds) | 190 gr (0.42 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 117 x 70 x 57mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 2.2") | 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 270 photos | 390 photos |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-50 | DB65 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $500 | $599 |