Hasselblad X1D vs Sony NEX-5R
60 Imaging
82 Features
74 Overall
78
89 Imaging
57 Features
76 Overall
64
Hasselblad X1D vs Sony NEX-5R Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Revealed June 2016
- Newer Model is Hasselblad X1D II 50C
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 276g - 111 x 59 x 39mm
- Launched August 2012
- Older Model is Sony NEX-5N
- Later Model is Sony NEX-5T
Hasselblad X1D vs Sony NEX-5R Overview
In this article, we will be looking at the Hasselblad X1D vs Sony NEX-5R, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies Hasselblad and Sony. There exists a noticeable gap among the sensor resolutions of the X1D (51MP) and NEX-5R (16MP) and the X1D (Medium format) and NEX-5R (APS-C) possess different sensor sizes.
Photography GlossaryThe X1D was announced 3 years later than the NEX-5R and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before we go in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a concise summation of how the X1D grades vs the NEX-5R when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Hasselblad X1D vs Sony NEX-5R Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Hasselblad X1D & Sony Alpha NEX-5R. The whole galleries are available at Hasselblad X1D Gallery & Sony NEX-5R Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D over the Sony NEX-5R
X1D | NEX-5R | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | June 2016 | August 2012 | Fresher by 47 months |
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-5R over the Hasselblad X1D
NEX-5R | X1D | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Common features in the Hasselblad X1D and Sony NEX-5R
X1D | NEX-5R | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More precise focus | |||
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen dimensions | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 920k | Identical screen resolution | |
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Hasselblad X1D vs Sony NEX-5R Physical Comparison
When you are intending to carry your camera often, you are going to need to think about its weight and proportions. The Hasselblad X1D has outer dimensions of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") and a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) while the Sony NEX-5R has measurements of 111mm x 59mm x 39mm (4.4" x 2.3" x 1.5") having a weight of 276 grams (0.61 lbs).
Contrast the Hasselblad X1D vs Sony NEX-5R in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilizing at the time. The following is the front view measurements comparison of the X1D vs the NEX-5R.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the X1D and NEX-5R is 60 and 89 respectively.
Hasselblad X1D vs Sony NEX-5R Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be tough to imagine the difference in sensor sizing merely by seeing specifications. The visual below will provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the X1D and NEX-5R.
To sum up, the 2 cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The X1D having a bigger sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF less difficult and the Hasselblad X1D will show extra detail with its extra 35 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots a little more aggressively. The newer X1D should have an edge in sensor innovation.
Hasselblad X1D vs Sony NEX-5R Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Hasselblad X1D vs Sony NEX-5R Specifications
Hasselblad X1D | Sony Alpha NEX-5R | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Hasselblad | Sony |
Model | Hasselblad X1D | Sony Alpha NEX-5R |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2016-06-22 | 2012-08-29 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Medium format | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 44 x 33mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 1,452.0mm² | 365.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 51 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 8272 x 6200 | 4912 x 3264 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 99 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Hasselblad X | Sony E |
Available lenses | 4 | 121 |
Focal length multiplier | 0.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 920 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display technology | - | Tilt Up 180� Down 50� TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 2.3 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/2000 seconds | 1/160 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (25p) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | H.264 | AVCHD |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 725g (1.60 pounds) | 276g (0.61 pounds) |
Dimensions | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") | 111 x 59 x 39mm (4.4" x 2.3" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 102 | 78 |
DXO Color Depth score | 26.2 | 23.7 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 14.8 | 13.1 |
DXO Low light score | 4489 | 910 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 330 photographs |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | NPFW50 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10sec (3 images)) |
Time lapse shooting | With downloadable app | |
Storage media | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | Dual | 1 |
Retail cost | $6,495 | $750 |