Hasselblad X2D vs Olympus E-M1X
56 Imaging
92 Features
78 Overall
86
54 Imaging
61 Features
93 Overall
73
Hasselblad X2D vs Olympus E-M1X Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 100MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3.60" Tilting Screen
- ISO 64 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 895g - 149 x 106 x 75mm
- Announced September 2022
- Replaced the Hasselblad X1D II 50C
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 997g - 144 x 147 x 75mm
- Revealed January 2019
- Superseded the Olympus E-M1 II
Hasselblad X2D vs Olympus E-M1X Overview
The following is a complete review of the Hasselblad X2D and Olympus E-M1X, both Pro Mirrorless cameras by brands Hasselblad and Olympus. There exists a crucial gap among the sensor resolutions of the X2D (100MP) and E-M1X (20MP) and the X2D (Medium format) and E-M1X (Four Thirds) offer different sensor size.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe X2D was launched 3 years after the E-M1X which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Hasselblad X2D being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus E-M1X being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving into a more detailed comparison, here is a quick summation of how the X2D grades vs the E-M1X in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Hasselblad X2D vs Olympus E-M1X Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Hasselblad X2D 100c and Olympus OM-D E-M1X. The complete galleries are provided at Hasselblad X2D Gallery and Olympus E-M1X Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X2D over the Olympus E-M1X
X2D | E-M1X | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2022 | January 2019 | Newer by 45 months | |
Screen size | 3.60" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.6") | |
Screen resolution | 2360k | 1037k | Sharper screen (+1323k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1X over the Hasselblad X2D
E-M1X | X2D | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Common features in the Hasselblad X2D and Olympus E-M1X
X2D | E-M1X | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More accurate focusing | |||
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Hasselblad X2D vs Olympus E-M1X Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to travel with your camera often, you'll need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Hasselblad X2D features physical measurements of 149mm x 106mm x 75mm (5.9" x 4.2" x 3.0") along with a weight of 895 grams (1.97 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-M1X has measurements of 144mm x 147mm x 75mm (5.7" x 5.8" x 3.0") accompanied by a weight of 997 grams (2.20 lbs).
Analyze the Hasselblad X2D and Olympus E-M1X in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you select at that moment. Following is a front view dimension comparison of the X2D and the E-M1X.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the X2D and E-M1X is 56 and 54 respectively.
Hasselblad X2D vs Olympus E-M1X Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's difficult to picture the contrast in sensor dimensions only by viewing a spec sheet. The image below should offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the X2D and E-M1X.
Clearly, the two cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The X2D because of its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF easier and the Hasselblad X2D will result in extra detail utilizing its extra 80 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop photographs way more aggressively. The more recent X2D should have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
Hasselblad X2D vs Olympus E-M1X Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Hasselblad X2D vs Olympus E-M1X Specifications
Hasselblad X2D 100c | Olympus OM-D E-M1X | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Hasselblad | Olympus |
Model | Hasselblad X2D 100c | Olympus OM-D E-M1X |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
Announced | 2022-09-07 | 2019-01-24 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Dual TruePic VIII |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Medium format | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 44 x 33mm | 17.4 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 1,452.0mm² | 226.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 100MP | 20MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 4:3 |
Peak resolution | 11656 x 8742 | 5184 x 3888 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 200 |
RAW photos | ||
Min enhanced ISO | - | 64 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 294 | 121 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Hasselblad X | Micro Four Thirds |
Number of lenses | 13 | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 0.8 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Tilting | Fully Articulated |
Screen size | 3.60 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 2,360k dot | 1,037k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 5,760k dot | 2,360k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.87x | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4080s | 60s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/8000s |
Fastest silent shutter speed | 1/6000s | 1/32000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.3 frames/s | 60.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash options | TTL center weighted system, compatible with Nikon System Flashes | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain), manual |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/4000s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Highest video resolution | - | 4096x2160 |
Video format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10 GBit/sec) | Yes (USB-PD allows charging by laptop or external power bank) |
GPS | None | Built-in |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 895 gr (1.97 lbs) | 997 gr (2.20 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 149 x 106 x 75mm (5.9" x 4.2" x 3.0") | 144 x 147 x 75mm (5.7" x 5.8" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 420 photographs | 870 photographs |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Built-in |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | CFexpress Type B, 1TB Internal Storage | - |
Storage slots | Single | Two |
Launch cost | $8,199 | $2,999 |