Kodak C135 vs Nikon A900
92 Imaging
37 Features
17 Overall
29
88 Imaging
45 Features
58 Overall
50
Kodak C135 vs Nikon A900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.4" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1250
- 640 x 480 video
- 35mm (F3.0) lens
- 175g - 147 x 58 x 23mm
- Revealed January 2012
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-840mm (F3.4-6.9) lens
- 289g - 113 x 67 x 40mm
- Released February 2016
- Successor is Nikon A1000
Photography Glossary Kodak C135 vs Nikon A900 Overview
Let's look more closely at the Kodak C135 versus Nikon A900, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Kodak and Nikon. There exists a sizable gap between the sensor resolutions of the C135 (14MP) and A900 (20MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe C135 was manufactured 5 years prior to the A900 and that is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting right into a thorough comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the C135 matches up against the A900 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Kodak C135 vs Nikon A900 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Kodak EasyShare C135 & Nikon Coolpix A900. The entire galleries are available at Kodak C135 Gallery & Nikon A900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak C135 over the Nikon A900
| C135 | A900 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Nikon A900 over the Kodak C135
| A900 | C135 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2016 | January 2012 | Fresher by 50 months | |
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.4" | Bigger screen (+0.6") | |
| Screen resolution | 921k | 112k | Sharper screen (+809k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak C135 and Nikon A900
| C135 | A900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Lack of manual focusing | |||
| Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Kodak C135 vs Nikon A900 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry your camera regularly, you are going to need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Kodak C135 offers physical dimensions of 147mm x 58mm x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs) whilst the Nikon A900 has measurements of 113mm x 67mm x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") along with a weight of 289 grams (0.64 lbs).
Check the Kodak C135 versus Nikon A900 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you use at that time. Below is a front view proportions comparison of the C135 and the A900.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the C135 and A900 is 92 and 88 respectively.
Kodak C135 vs Nikon A900 Sensor Comparison
Normally, its difficult to imagine the gap between sensor sizing just by reviewing specs. The photograph underneath will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the C135 and A900.
All in all, the 2 cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different megapixels. You can count on the Nikon A900 to offer more detail due to its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The older C135 is going to be behind in sensor technology.
Kodak C135 vs Nikon A900 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Kodak C135 vs Nikon A900 Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare C135 | Nikon Coolpix A900 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Kodak | Nikon |
| Model | Kodak EasyShare C135 | Nikon Coolpix A900 |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2012-01-10 | 2016-02-23 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 20MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Full resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Max native ISO | 1250 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 35mm (1x) | 24-840mm (35.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.0 | f/3.4-6.9 |
| Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen sizing | 2.4 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 112k dot | 921k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen technology | TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 8 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1400 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 7.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 2.40 m (@ ISO 360) | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | - |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30fps) | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p, 25p) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 3840x2160 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 175 grams (0.39 lb) | 289 grams (0.64 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 147 x 58 x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 113 x 67 x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 photos |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | 2 x AA | EN-EL12 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2, 5, 10 secs) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at launch | $0 | $400 |