Olympus TG-870 vs Panasonic F5
91 Imaging
41 Features
46 Overall
43
96 Imaging
38 Features
23 Overall
32
Olympus TG-870 vs Panasonic F5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400 (Expand to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 221g - 113 x 64 x 28mm
- Announced January 2016
- Older Model is Olympus TG-860
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.2-6.5) lens
- 121g - 97 x 58 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2013
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus TG-870 vs Panasonic F5 Overview
Let's examine more in depth at the Olympus TG-870 vs Panasonic F5, one being a Ultracompact and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the TG-870 (16MP) and the F5 (14MP) is fairly close and they come with the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe TG-870 was announced 3 years later than the F5 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus TG-870 being a Ultracompact camera and the Panasonic F5 being a Compact camera.
Before delving through a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the TG-870 scores against the F5 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus TG-870 vs Panasonic F5 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-F5. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-870 Gallery and Panasonic F5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-870 over the Panasonic F5
| TG-870 | F5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2016 |  | January 2013 | More recent by 37 months |
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 921k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+691k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic F5 over the Olympus TG-870
| F5 | TG-870 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-870 and Panasonic F5
| TG-870 | F5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Olympus TG-870 vs Panasonic F5 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to lug around your camera frequently, you'll have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-870 has got outer dimensions of 113mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") and a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs) and the Panasonic F5 has dimensions of 97mm x 58mm x 22mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs).
Check out the Olympus TG-870 vs Panasonic F5 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you choose at the time. Here is the front view over all size comparison of the TG-870 and the F5.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the TG-870 and F5 is 91 and 96 respectively.
Olympus TG-870 vs Panasonic F5 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very tough to envision the gap in sensor measurements only by viewing specs. The photograph below will help provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-870 and F5.
As you can plainly see, each of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same MP. You should anticipate the Olympus TG-870 to result in greater detail with its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos much more aggressively. The more recent TG-870 will have an edge with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus TG-870 vs Panasonic F5 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Olympus TG-870 vs Panasonic F5 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-F5 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-F5 |
| Category | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2016-01-06 | 2013-01-07 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic VII | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Max enhanced ISO | 12800 | - |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 21-105mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.7 | f/3.2-6.5 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Screen resolution | 921 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 7.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) | 5.70 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 221 grams (0.49 lb) | 121 grams (0.27 lb) |
| Dimensions | 113 x 64 x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") | 97 x 58 x 22mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 pictures | 250 pictures |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | Li-50B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $280 | $100 |
