Clicky

Kodak C135 vs Samsung WB210

Portability
92
Imaging
38
Features
17
Overall
29
Kodak EasyShare C135 front
 
Samsung WB210 front
Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
45
Overall
40

Kodak C135 vs Samsung WB210 Key Specs

Kodak C135
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.4" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1250
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 35mm (F3.0) lens
  • 175g - 147 x 58 x 23mm
  • Released January 2012
Samsung WB210
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600 (Expand to 3200)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-288mm (F2.9-5.9) lens
  • 174g - 101 x 59 x 22mm
  • Launched July 2011
TikTok Developing Photo App to Challenge Instagram's Dominance

Kodak C135 vs Samsung WB210 Overview

On this page, we are looking at the Kodak C135 versus Samsung WB210, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Kodak and Samsung. The image resolution of the C135 (14MP) and the WB210 (14MP) is very close and both cameras boast the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").

Leica struggles with L-Mount camera sales, tougher than Q or M

The C135 was released 6 months later than the WB210 so they are both of a similar age. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).

Before getting right into a detailed comparison, here is a simple summary of how the C135 scores versus the WB210 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Ulanzi's Tripod Ensures Ultra Smooth Filming
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak C135 over the Samsung WB210

 C135 WB210 
Display resolution112k1kSharper display (+111k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung WB210 over the Kodak C135

 WB210 C135 
Focus manually Dial accurate focusing
Display dimensions3.5"2.4"Larger display (+1.1")
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Common features in the Kodak C135 and Samsung WB210

 C135 WB210 
LaunchedJanuary 2012July 2011Same age
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen

Kodak C135 vs Samsung WB210 Physical Comparison

If you are planning to lug around your camera often, you will have to consider its weight and measurements. The Kodak C135 provides exterior measurements of 147mm x 58mm x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") along with a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs) and the Samsung WB210 has proportions of 101mm x 59mm x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 174 grams (0.38 lbs).

Check the Kodak C135 versus Samsung WB210 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are working with at the time. Below is a front view measurements comparison of the C135 versus the WB210.

Kodak C135 vs Samsung WB210 size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability score of the C135 and WB210 is 92 and 94 respectively.

Kodak C135 vs Samsung WB210 top view buttons comparison

Kodak C135 vs Samsung WB210 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it is tough to see the difference in sensor measurements just by researching a spec sheet. The visual underneath may offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the C135 and WB210.

Clearly, both of those cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the same exact megapixels so you can expect comparable quality of files though you need to take the launch date of the cameras into account.

Kodak C135 vs Samsung WB210 sensor size comparison

Kodak C135 vs Samsung WB210 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak C135 vs Samsung WB210 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
AI-Powered Photo Editing Tools Could Be Added to WhatsApp

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak C135 as a Portrait photography camera
Samsung WB210 as a Portrait photography camera
34
good megapixels (14MP)
supports face detection autofocus
focusing manually not possible
lack of manual mode
cannot use external flash
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
39
manual focus
decent MP (14 megapixels)
has face detection autofocus
manual mode not available
cannot use external flash
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Fujifilm accuses Eastman Kodak of patent violation in new lawsuit

Street Comparison

Street photography with Kodak C135
Street photography with Samsung WB210
53
weather sealing
no moving screen
no image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
max ISO too low (1,250)
66
image stabilization (Optical)
boasts touch focus
lighter than others in class (174g)
no articulating screen
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Google AI Gemini Could Enhance iPhone Experience, Talks Suggest

Sports Comparison

Kodak C135 Sports photography details
Samsung WB210 Sports photography details
31
good megapixels (14MP)
weather sealing
can't change focal length (35mm)
maximum shutter speed is a little low (1/1,400 seconds)
lack of shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
38
image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (14MP)
no shutter priority
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
Peek Behind the Lens of 'Photographer' and Their Go-To Cameras

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Kodak C135
Travel photography with Samsung WB210
64
weather sealing
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
built-in flash
does not have Timelapse recording
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
71
lighter than others in class (174g)
boasts touch focus
decent MP (14MP)
has built in flash
rather wide (24mm)
very long zoom (288mm)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
slow max aperture (f2.9)
Nikon Coolpix camera search on Google skyrockets by 8,500%

Landscape Comparison

Kodak C135 Landscape photography info
Samsung WB210 Landscape photography info
32
good megapixels (14MP)
weather sealing
focusing manually not possible
can't swap lens (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (35mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
screen is small (2.4 inches)
lack of manual mode
no image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
max ISO too low (1,250)
lacks RAW support
does not have Timelapse recording
46
manual focus
rather wide (24mm)
very good size screen (3.5")
image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (14 megapixels)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.9)
manual mode not available
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
doesn't have Timelapse recording
Apple patent reveals improved iPhone camera durability

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak C135 as a Vlogging camera
Samsung WB210 as a Vlogging camera
25
supports face detection autofocus
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
no image stabilization
low quality video (640 x 480 pxls)
does not have external microphone jack
33
rather wide (24mm)
screen is touchscreen
image stabilization (Optical)
has face detection autofocus
lighter than others in class (174g)
slow max aperture (f2.9)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pxls)
doesn't have external microphone port
Europe Approves Revolutionary AI Legislation

Kodak C135 vs Samsung WB210 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak C135 and Samsung WB210
 Kodak EasyShare C135Samsung WB210
General Information
Brand Name Kodak Samsung
Model Kodak EasyShare C135 Samsung WB210
Type Waterproof Small Sensor Superzoom
Released 2012-01-10 2011-07-19
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 4288 x 3216 4320 x 3240
Maximum native ISO 1250 1600
Maximum boosted ISO - 3200
Min native ISO 80 80
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 35mm (1x) 24-288mm (12.0x)
Maximal aperture f/3.0 f/2.9-5.9
Macro focus range - 5cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 2.4" 3.5"
Screen resolution 112 thousand dot 1 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Screen tech TFT color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 8s 8s
Highest shutter speed 1/1400s 1/2000s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 2.40 m (@ ISO 360) 3.50 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30fps) 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 175g (0.39 lb) 174g (0.38 lb)
Physical dimensions 147 x 58 x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") 101 x 59 x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model 2 x AA -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media SD/SDHC card, Internal microSC/SDHC, Internal
Storage slots One One
Cost at launch $0 $279