Kodak C140 vs Ricoh WG-80
94 Imaging
31 Features
10 Overall
22
91 Imaging
44 Features
35 Overall
40
Kodak C140 vs Ricoh WG-80 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1000
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-108mm (F2.7-4.8) lens
- 160g - 92 x 63 x 22mm
- Launched January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.70" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Announced May 2022
- Superseded the Ricoh WG-70
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Kodak C140 vs Ricoh WG-80 Overview
Following is a extended overview of the Kodak C140 vs Ricoh WG-80, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by companies Kodak and Ricoh. There is a substantial difference between the image resolutions of the C140 (8MP) and WG-80 (16MP) and the C140 (1/2.5") and WG-80 (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor dimensions.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe C140 was introduced 14 years prior to the WG-80 which is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving into a in depth comparison, here is a brief summary of how the C140 scores against the WG-80 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Kodak C140 vs Ricoh WG-80 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Kodak EasyShare C140 & Ricoh WG-80. The whole galleries are available at Kodak C140 Gallery & Ricoh WG-80 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak C140 over the Ricoh WG-80
| C140 | WG-80 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-80 over the Kodak C140
| WG-80 | C140 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | May 2022 |  | January 2009 | More modern by 162 months |
| Manual focus |  | Dial accurate focus |
Common features in the Kodak C140 and Ricoh WG-80
| C140 | WG-80 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen size | 2.7" |  | 2.70" | Same screen sizing |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Kodak C140 vs Ricoh WG-80 Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry around your camera often, you are going to need to think about its weight and volume. The Kodak C140 comes with outer dimensions of 92mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") having a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-80 has sizing of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Check out the Kodak C140 vs Ricoh WG-80 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the C140 versus the WG-80.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the C140 and WG-80 is 94 and 91 respectively.
Kodak C140 vs Ricoh WG-80 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is difficult to envision the difference between sensor sizes just by reading through specs. The image underneath should give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the C140 and WG-80.
All in all, both the cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The C140 with its tinier sensor will make shooting shallower DOF tougher and the Ricoh WG-80 will give you extra detail using its extra 8MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The more aged C140 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Kodak C140 vs Ricoh WG-80 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Kodak C140 vs Ricoh WG-80 Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare C140 | Ricoh WG-80 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Kodak | Ricoh |
| Model | Kodak EasyShare C140 | Ricoh WG-80 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2009-01-08 | 2022-05-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.5" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 24.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 8MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1000 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 36-108mm (3.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.7-4.8 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus range | 13cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 6.3 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.7 inch | 2.70 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1400s | 1/4000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.00 m | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | On, off |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 160g (0.35 lbs) | 193g (0.43 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 92 x 63 x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 photographs |
| Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | 2 x AA | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail price | $80 | $300 |