Kodak C140 vs Samsung SL102
94 Imaging
31 Features
10 Overall
22
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
Kodak C140 vs Samsung SL102 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1000
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-108mm (F2.7-4.8) lens
- 160g - 92 x 63 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2009
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2009
- Other Name is ES55
Photography Glossary Kodak C140 vs Samsung SL102 Overview
Its time to look closer at the Kodak C140 versus Samsung SL102, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by competitors Kodak and Samsung. The resolution of the C140 (8MP) and the SL102 (10MP) is very well matched but the C140 (1/2.5") and SL102 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor measurements.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe C140 was revealed at a similar time to the SL102 and they are of a similar age. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go into a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple view of how the C140 matches up versus the SL102 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Kodak C140 vs Samsung SL102 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Kodak EasyShare C140 & Samsung SL102. The full galleries are available at Kodak C140 Gallery & Samsung SL102 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak C140 over the Samsung SL102
| C140 | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display size | 2.7" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Kodak C140
| SL102 | C140 |
|---|
Common features in the Kodak C140 and Samsung SL102
| C140 | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2009 |  | January 2009 | Similar age |
| Manually focus |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Equal display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Lack of Touch display |
Kodak C140 vs Samsung SL102 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to travel with your camera regularly, you will have to think about its weight and measurements. The Kodak C140 enjoys exterior dimensions of 92mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") and a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Samsung SL102 has proportions of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).
Check out the Kodak C140 versus Samsung SL102 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Below is a front view proportions comparison of the C140 compared to the SL102.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the C140 and SL102 is 94 and 96 respectively.
Kodak C140 vs Samsung SL102 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is difficult to envision the contrast between sensor dimensions merely by reading through technical specs. The pic underneath will help give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the C140 and SL102.
As you have seen, both cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The C140 having a tinier sensor will make shooting shallower DOF tougher and the Samsung SL102 will resolve more detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop photos way more aggressively.
Kodak C140 vs Samsung SL102 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Kodak C140 vs Samsung SL102 Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare C140 | Samsung SL102 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Kodak | Samsung |
| Model type | Kodak EasyShare C140 | Samsung SL102 |
| Also referred to as | - | ES55 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2009-01-08 | 2009-01-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.5" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 24.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 8MP | 10MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 1000 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 36-108mm (3.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.7-4.8 | - |
| Macro focusing range | 13cm | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 6.3 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7 inches | 2.5 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1400 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.00 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 160 gr (0.35 lbs) | 116 gr (0.26 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 92 x 63 x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | 2 x AA | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $80 | $130 |
