Kodak M320 vs Nikon S800c
95 Imaging
32 Features
10 Overall
23
93 Imaging
40 Features
40 Overall
40
Kodak M320 vs Nikon S800c Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 34-102mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
- 155g - 97 x 60 x 21mm
- Released January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-250mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 184g - 111 x 60 x 27mm
- Launched February 2013
Kodak M320 vs Nikon S800c Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Kodak M320 versus Nikon S800c, one is a Ultracompact and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Kodak and Nikon. There exists a sizeable gap between the image resolutions of the M320 (9MP) and S800c (16MP) and the M320 (1/2.5") and S800c (1/2.3") boast different sensor size.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe M320 was manufactured 5 years prior to the S800c which is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Kodak M320 being a Ultracompact camera and the Nikon S800c being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight to a thorough comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the M320 grades vs the S800c with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Kodak M320 vs Nikon S800c Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Kodak EasyShare M320 and Nikon Coolpix S800c. The entire galleries are provided at Kodak M320 Gallery and Nikon S800c Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak M320 over the Nikon S800c
M320 | S800c |
---|
Reasons to pick Nikon S800c over the Kodak M320
S800c | M320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2013 | January 2009 | Newer by 49 months | |
Screen dimensions | 3.5" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.8") | |
Screen resolution | 819k | 230k | Clearer screen (+589k dot) | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Kodak M320 and Nikon S800c
M320 | S800c | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Lack of manual focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen |
Kodak M320 vs Nikon S800c Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to travel with your camera often, you are going to need to take into account its weight and volume. The Kodak M320 provides outer measurements of 97mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") and a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Nikon S800c has sizing of 111mm x 60mm x 27mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 184 grams (0.41 lbs).
Compare the Kodak M320 versus Nikon S800c in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are working with at that moment. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the M320 and the S800c.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the M320 and S800c is 95 and 93 respectively.
Kodak M320 vs Nikon S800c Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very hard to picture the gap between sensor dimensions simply by reviewing specs. The image below should provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the M320 and S800c.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras have different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The M320 because of its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field harder and the Nikon S800c will deliver extra detail due to its extra 7 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The more aged M320 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Kodak M320 vs Nikon S800c Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Kodak M320 vs Nikon S800c Specifications
Kodak EasyShare M320 | Nikon Coolpix S800c | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Kodak | Nikon |
Model type | Kodak EasyShare M320 | Nikon Coolpix S800c |
Category | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2009-01-08 | 2013-02-04 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Expeed C2 |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.5" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 24.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 9 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Max resolution | 3472 x 2604 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 125 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 25 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 34-102mm (3.0x) | 25-250mm (10.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.8-5.1 | f/3.2-5.8 |
Macro focusing range | 10cm | 10cm |
Focal length multiplier | 6.3 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.7 inches | 3.5 inches |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 819 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display tech | - | OLED panel with Anti-reflection coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/1400 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 8.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m | - |
Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | - |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 155g (0.34 lb) | 184g (0.41 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 97 x 60 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") | 111 x 60 x 27mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 140 photos |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | KLIC-7001 | EN-EL12 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (10 or 2 seconds) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at release | $39 | $290 |