Kodak M320 vs Sony TX100V
95 Imaging
31 Features
10 Overall
22
95 Imaging
38 Features
40 Overall
38
Kodak M320 vs Sony TX100V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 34-102mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
- 155g - 97 x 60 x 21mm
- Introduced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F3.5-4.6) lens
- 147g - 97 x 59 x 18mm
- Released January 2011
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Kodak M320 vs Sony TX100V Overview
Let's take a closer look at the Kodak M320 versus Sony TX100V, both Ultracompact cameras by manufacturers Kodak and Sony. There exists a large gap among the image resolutions of the M320 (9MP) and TX100V (16MP) and the M320 (1/2.5") and TX100V (1/2.3") have totally different sensor size.
Photography GlossaryThe M320 was launched 24 months before the TX100V which makes them a generation apart from one another. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before we go into a thorough comparison, here is a brief summary of how the M320 grades versus the TX100V in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Kodak M320 vs Sony TX100V Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Kodak EasyShare M320 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX100V. The complete galleries are viewable at Kodak M320 Gallery & Sony TX100V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak M320 over the Sony TX100V
| M320 | TX100V |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony TX100V over the Kodak M320
| TX100V | M320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2011 |  | January 2009 | Fresher by 24 months |
| Screen dimensions | 3.5" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.8") |
| Screen resolution | 1229k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+999k dot) |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Kodak M320 and Sony TX100V
| M320 | TX100V | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen |
Kodak M320 vs Sony TX100V Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry your camera often, you will need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Kodak M320 has got outer dimensions of 97mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") and a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Sony TX100V has dimensions of 97mm x 59mm x 18mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.7") having a weight of 147 grams (0.32 lbs).
Check the Kodak M320 versus Sony TX100V in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilising at that moment. The following is a front view scale comparison of the M320 against the TX100V.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the M320 and TX100V is 95 and 95 respectively.
Kodak M320 vs Sony TX100V Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very difficult to visualise the difference in sensor sizing purely by researching specifications. The photograph here will help give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the M320 and TX100V.
Plainly, both cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The M320 due to its smaller sensor will make getting bokeh tougher and the Sony TX100V will provide you with more detail utilizing its extra 7MP. Higher resolution will let you crop shots more aggressively. The older M320 will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Kodak M320 vs Sony TX100V Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Kodak M320 vs Sony TX100V Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare M320 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX100V | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Kodak | Sony |
| Model type | Kodak EasyShare M320 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX100V |
| Class | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2009-01-08 | 2011-01-06 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | BIONZ |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.5" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 24.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 9 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3472 x 2604 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | 25 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 34-102mm (3.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8-5.1 | f/3.5-4.6 |
| Macro focusing range | 10cm | - |
| Crop factor | 6.3 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.7" | 3.5" |
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 1,229k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display tech | - | XtraFine OLED display with TruBlack technology |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 2s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1400s | 1/1600s |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 10.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.00 m | 4.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 155 gr (0.34 lbs) | 147 gr (0.32 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 97 x 60 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") | 97 x 59 x 18mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | KLIC-7001 | NP-BN1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail price | $39 | $380 |