Clicky

Kodak M320 vs Sony W560

Portability
95
Imaging
32
Features
10
Overall
23
Kodak EasyShare M320 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W560 front
Portability
96
Imaging
37
Features
28
Overall
33

Kodak M320 vs Sony W560 Key Specs

Kodak M320
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 34-102mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
  • 155g - 97 x 60 x 21mm
  • Revealed January 2009
Sony W560
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 26-104mm (F2.7-5.7) lens
  • 110g - 94 x 56 x 19mm
  • Announced January 2011
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Kodak M320 vs Sony W560 Overview

Let's look a little more in depth at the Kodak M320 and Sony W560, both Ultracompact cameras by brands Kodak and Sony. There exists a crucial gap among the image resolutions of the M320 (9MP) and W560 (14MP) and the M320 (1/2.5") and W560 (1/2.3") come with totally different sensor sizes.

Photography Glossary

The M320 was brought out 24 months before the W560 making the cameras a generation away from one another. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Ultracompact).

Before getting straight into a in depth comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the M320 scores versus the W560 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

				

Reasons to pick Kodak M320 over the Sony W560

 M320 W560 

Reasons to pick Sony W560 over the Kodak M320

 W560 M320 
AnnouncedJanuary 2011January 2009More modern by 24 months
Display sizing3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")

Common features in the Kodak M320 and Sony W560

 M320 W560 
Focus manually No manual focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display resolution230k230kIdentical display resolution
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither offers Touch friendly display

Kodak M320 vs Sony W560 Physical Comparison

For those who are going to carry around your camera frequently, you'll have to think about its weight and size. The Kodak M320 offers exterior dimensions of 97mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") along with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Sony W560 has specifications of 94mm x 56mm x 19mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 110 grams (0.24 lbs).

Analyze the Kodak M320 and Sony W560 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are working with at that time. Here is the front view sizing comparison of the M320 and the W560.

Kodak M320 vs Sony W560 size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the M320 and W560 is 95 and 96 respectively.

Kodak M320 vs Sony W560 top view buttons comparison

Kodak M320 vs Sony W560 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it can be hard to see the contrast in sensor sizes only by viewing specs. The picture below might provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the M320 and W560.

As you can plainly see, each of these cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The M320 featuring a smaller sensor will make shooting shallow DOF trickier and the Sony W560 will render extra detail having its extra 5MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop images far more aggressively. The more aged M320 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.

Kodak M320 vs Sony W560 sensor size comparison

Kodak M320 vs Sony W560 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak M320 vs Sony W560 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak M320 Portrait photography factors
Sony W560 Portrait photography factors
19
no manual focus
manual exposure not possible
can't use external flash
megapixel count low (9MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.5")
lacks RAW files
28
good megapixels (14MP)
lack of manual focus
no manual control
no external flash support
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Street photography with Kodak M320
Street photography with Sony W560
47
screen is fixed
no image stabilization
sensor size is small (1/2.5")
lacks RAW files
more heavy than average (155g)
57
built in image stabilization (Optical)
screen is fixed
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Kodak M320 Sports photography features
Sony W560 Sports photography features
16
low max shutter speed (1/1,400 seconds)
no shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
megapixel count low (9 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.5")
lacks phase detect AF
35
built in image stabilization (Optical)
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
max frames per second low (1.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority mode
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Kodak M320
Travel photography with Sony W560
50
has built in flash
doesn't have Timelapse recording
more heavy than average (155 grams)
megapixel count low (9MP)
display isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not good (34mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
65
good megapixels (14MP)
built-in flash
quite wide (26mm)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.7)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Kodak M320 Landscape photography highlights
Sony W560 Landscape photography highlights
22
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not good (34mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
tiny screen (2.7 inch)
manual exposure not possible
no image stabilization
megapixel count low (9 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.5")
lacks RAW files
doesn't have Timelapse recording
42
quite wide (26mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
good megapixels (14MP)
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.7)
no manual control
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
doesn't have Timelapse mode
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Kodak M320
Vlogging with Sony W560
22
wide angle not good (34mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
display isn't selfie friendly
no image stabilization
video res low (640 x 480 resolution)
doesn't have external microphone port
more heavy than average (155g)
29
quite wide (26mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.7)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pxls)
doesn't have external microphone support
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Kodak M320 vs Sony W560 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak M320 and Sony W560
 Kodak EasyShare M320Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W560
General Information
Brand Kodak Sony
Model type Kodak EasyShare M320 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W560
Category Ultracompact Ultracompact
Revealed 2009-01-08 2011-01-06
Physical type Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Chip - BIONZ
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.5" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 5.744 x 4.308mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 24.7mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 9 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Full resolution 3472 x 2604 4320 x 3240
Max native ISO 1600 3200
Minimum native ISO 80 80
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Total focus points 25 9
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 34-102mm (3.0x) 26-104mm (4.0x)
Largest aperture f/2.8-5.1 f/2.7-5.7
Macro focusing distance 10cm 5cm
Crop factor 6.3 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 2.7 inch 3 inch
Display resolution 230k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Display tech - Clear Photo LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4s 2s
Maximum shutter speed 1/1400s 1/1600s
Continuous shooting rate - 1.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 3.00 m 3.80 m
Flash modes Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video data format Motion JPEG MPEG-4
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 155 grams (0.34 lb) 110 grams (0.24 lb)
Dimensions 97 x 60 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") 94 x 56 x 19mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID KLIC-7001 NP-BN1
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo
Card slots 1 1
Cost at launch $39 $139