Kodak M341 vs Olympus TG-860
96 Imaging
34 Features
14 Overall
26
91 Imaging
40 Features
42 Overall
40
Kodak M341 vs Olympus TG-860 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-175mm (F3.0-4.8) lens
- 135g - 96 x 59 x 19mm
- Released July 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 224g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
- Revealed February 2015
- Updated by Olympus TG-870
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Kodak M341 vs Olympus TG-860 Overview
Its time to look a little more closely at the Kodak M341 and Olympus TG-860, one being a Ultracompact and the other is a Waterproof by brands Kodak and Olympus. There is a huge difference between the image resolutions of the M341 (12MP) and TG-860 (16MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe M341 was released 6 years prior to the TG-860 and that is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before we go into a complete comparison, here is a concise view of how the M341 scores vs the TG-860 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Kodak M341 vs Olympus TG-860 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Kodak EasyShare M341 and Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860. The complete galleries are viewable at Kodak M341 Gallery and Olympus TG-860 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak M341 over the Olympus TG-860
| M341 | TG-860 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-860 over the Kodak M341
| TG-860 | M341 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2015 |  | July 2009 | More recent by 67 months |
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak M341 and Olympus TG-860
| M341 | TG-860 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Absent Touch friendly display |
Kodak M341 vs Olympus TG-860 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to lug around your camera regularly, you'll need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Kodak M341 enjoys exterior measurements of 96mm x 59mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.7") having a weight of 135 grams (0.30 lbs) and the Olympus TG-860 has measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 224 grams (0.49 lbs).
See the Kodak M341 and Olympus TG-860 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have at that moment. Underneath is a front view over all size comparison of the M341 versus the TG-860.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the M341 and TG-860 is 96 and 91 respectively.
Kodak M341 vs Olympus TG-860 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's tough to visualise the difference between sensor measurements merely by going over specs. The graphic below will provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the M341 and TG-860.
All in all, both of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but not the same MP. You should anticipate the Olympus TG-860 to deliver extra detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop photos more aggressively. The older M341 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Kodak M341 vs Olympus TG-860 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Kodak M341 vs Olympus TG-860 Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare M341 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Kodak | Olympus |
| Model | Kodak EasyShare M341 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 |
| Category | Ultracompact | Waterproof |
| Released | 2009-07-29 | 2015-02-06 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 125 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 35-175mm (5.0x) | 21-105mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.0-4.8 | f/3.5-5.7 |
| Macro focus range | 10cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 230k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 4 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1400 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 7.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.20 m | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | Yes |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 135g (0.30 pounds) | 224g (0.49 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 96 x 59 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 pictures |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | KLIC-7003 | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail cost | $130 | $279 |