Kodak M550 vs Ricoh GR Digital III
95 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c532d/c532d2c94a63bf44fa0e8cd9c6dd7f028438f940" alt="Kodak EasyShare M550 front Kodak EasyShare M550 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c0394/c039434b1259b0983aa2fa353205f299c35090eb" alt="Ricoh GR Digital III front Ricoh GR Digital III front"
92 Imaging
34 Features
35 Overall
34
Kodak M550 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1000
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-140mm (F) lens
- 125g - 98 x 58 x 23mm
- Introduced January 2010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
- Launched July 2009
- Newer Model is Ricoh GR Digital IV
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Kodak M550 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Overview
On this page, we will be reviewing the Kodak M550 and Ricoh GR Digital III, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by manufacturers Kodak and Ricoh. The resolution of the M550 (12MP) and the GR Digital III (10MP) is pretty similar but the M550 (1/2.3") and GR Digital III (1/1.7") boast totally different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The M550 was announced 6 months later than the GR Digital III which means that they are both of a similar age. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go into a more detailed comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the M550 grades vs the GR Digital III in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Kodak M550 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Kodak EasyShare M550 & Ricoh GR Digital III. The whole galleries are available at Kodak M550 Gallery & Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak M550 over the Ricoh GR Digital III
M550 | GR Digital III |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Kodak M550
GR Digital III | M550 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More exact focus | ||
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak M550 and Ricoh GR Digital III
M550 | GR Digital III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2010 | ![]() | July 2009 | Similar age |
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Kodak M550 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Physical Comparison
When you are going to carry your camera regularly, you will have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Kodak M550 has got outer dimensions of 98mm x 58mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) while the Ricoh GR Digital III has measurements of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") and a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs).
Analyze the Kodak M550 and Ricoh GR Digital III in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are working with at that moment. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the M550 against the GR Digital III.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7c2b7/7c2b71763ae2ffc033cbc8b96226f9ec41d78b82" alt="Kodak M550 vs Ricoh GR Digital III size comparison Kodak M550 vs Ricoh GR Digital III size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the M550 and GR Digital III is 95 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/228d8/228d8ed90166d20129c554875ac4b73fed5489bc" alt="Kodak M550 vs Ricoh GR Digital III top view buttons comparison Kodak M550 vs Ricoh GR Digital III top view buttons comparison"
Kodak M550 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very hard to visualise the gap between sensor sizing simply by reviewing a spec sheet. The graphic below might offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the M550 and GR Digital III.
As you can see, both cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The M550 with its tinier sensor will make shooting bokeh harder and the Kodak M550 will offer you more detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop shots a bit more aggressively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e82e3/e82e394f49d7a14d571d3145b4dfbd0c2074f7ab" alt="Kodak M550 vs Ricoh GR Digital III sensor size comparison Kodak M550 vs Ricoh GR Digital III sensor size comparison"
Kodak M550 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d69a/6d69ada3278b8f5c7365a50cfd71c22a471f9f07" alt="Kodak M550 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Screen and Viewfinder comparison Kodak M550 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Kodak M550 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Specifications
Kodak EasyShare M550 | Ricoh GR Digital III | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Kodak | Ricoh |
Model | Kodak EasyShare M550 | Ricoh GR Digital III |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2010-01-05 | 2009-07-27 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | GR engine III |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 1000 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 64 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
Max aperture | - | f/1.9 |
Macro focus distance | 10cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.7" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 230k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 30 seconds | 1 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/1400 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 3.50 m | 3.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 125 gr (0.28 pounds) | 208 gr (0.46 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 98 x 58 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | KLIC-7006 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, double) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail pricing | $119 | $399 |