Olympus E-330 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS
65 Imaging
41 Features
40 Overall
40
91 Imaging
39 Features
37 Overall
38
Olympus E-330 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 7MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Bump to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 616g - 140 x 87 x 72mm
- Introduced March 2006
- Additionally referred to as EVOLT E-330
- Old Model is Olympus E-300
- Successor is Olympus E-450
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 198g - 122 x 61 x 30mm
- Launched February 2012
Olympus E-330 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Overview
Its time to take a more detailed look at the Olympus E-330 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS, former being a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Waterproof by rivals Olympus and Pentax. There exists a considerable gap among the resolutions of the E-330 (7MP) and WG-2 GPS (16MP) and the E-330 (Four Thirds) and WG-2 GPS (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor size.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe E-330 was announced 6 years before the WG-2 GPS and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-330 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Pentax WG-2 GPS being a Compact camera.
Before getting straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief overview of how the E-330 grades vs the WG-2 GPS in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-330 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-330 & Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-330 Gallery & Pentax WG-2 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-330 over the Pentax WG-2 GPS
E-330 | WG-2 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-2 GPS over the Olympus E-330
WG-2 GPS | E-330 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2012 | March 2006 | More recent by 71 months | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 215k | Crisper screen (+245k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-330 and Pentax WG-2 GPS
E-330 | WG-2 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial exact focus | |||
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-330 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Physical Comparison
If you are planning to lug around your camera regularly, you'll have to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-330 has got outside measurements of 140mm x 87mm x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") with a weight of 616 grams (1.36 lbs) while the Pentax WG-2 GPS has proportions of 122mm x 61mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 198 grams (0.44 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-330 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you select during that time. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the E-330 compared to the WG-2 GPS.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-330 and WG-2 GPS is 65 and 91 respectively.
Olympus E-330 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is difficult to see the contrast in sensor measurements only by going through specs. The visual underneath may offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the E-330 and WG-2 GPS.
As you can plainly see, each of these cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-330 with its bigger sensor will make getting shallow depth of field simpler and the Pentax WG-2 GPS will provide extra detail with its extra 9MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop pictures more aggressively. The older E-330 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-330 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-330 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Specifications
Olympus E-330 | Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Pentax |
Model | Olympus E-330 | Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS |
Also Known as | EVOLT E-330 | - |
Class | Advanced DSLR | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2006-03-18 | 2012-02-07 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 7 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3136 x 2352 | 4288 x 3216 |
Max native ISO | 400 | 6400 |
Max boosted ISO | 1600 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.5" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 215 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | - | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.47x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames per sec | 1.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | 5.40 m |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 616 gr (1.36 pounds) | 198 gr (0.44 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 140 x 87 x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") | 122 x 61 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 260 photographs |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $1,100 | $300 |