Kodak M550 vs Samsung WB250F
95 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28
93 Imaging
37 Features
44 Overall
39
Kodak M550 vs Samsung WB250F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1000
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-140mm (F) lens
- 125g - 98 x 58 x 23mm
- Introduced January 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 226g - 106 x 62 x 22mm
- Launched January 2013
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Kodak M550 vs Samsung WB250F Overview
Below, we will be contrasting the Kodak M550 vs Samsung WB250F, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Kodak and Samsung. The image resolution of the M550 (12MP) and the WB250F (14MP) is relatively close and they come with the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe M550 was released 4 years earlier than the WB250F which is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the M550 matches up versus the WB250F in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Kodak M550 vs Samsung WB250F Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Kodak EasyShare M550 & Samsung WB250F. The complete galleries are viewable at Kodak M550 Gallery & Samsung WB250F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak M550 over the Samsung WB250F
| M550 | WB250F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB250F over the Kodak M550
| WB250F | M550 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2013 | January 2010 | Newer by 36 months | |
| Screen dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) | |
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Kodak M550 and Samsung WB250F
| M550 | WB250F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Lack of manual focus | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | No selfie screen |
Kodak M550 vs Samsung WB250F Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to travel with your camera frequently, you will need to factor its weight and volume. The Kodak M550 has got outside measurements of 98mm x 58mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) and the Samsung WB250F has sizing of 106mm x 62mm x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs).
Compare the Kodak M550 vs Samsung WB250F in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are employing at that moment. Here is the front view dimensions comparison of the M550 versus the WB250F.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the M550 and WB250F is 95 and 93 respectively.
Kodak M550 vs Samsung WB250F Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very hard to imagine the contrast in sensor dimensions just by viewing a spec sheet. The pic underneath might give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the M550 and WB250F.
Clearly, both of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different resolution. You can count on the Samsung WB250F to result in more detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop pictures much more aggressively. The more aged M550 will be behind in sensor tech.
Kodak M550 vs Samsung WB250F Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Kodak M550 vs Samsung WB250F Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare M550 | Samsung WB250F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Kodak | Samsung |
| Model | Kodak EasyShare M550 | Samsung WB250F |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2010-01-05 | 2013-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 1000 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | - | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focus range | 10cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 16 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1400 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 8.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.50 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | - |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 125 gr (0.28 lbs) | 226 gr (0.50 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 98 x 58 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 106 x 62 x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | KLIC-7006 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, double) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at launch | $119 | $250 |