Kodak Z915 vs Panasonic FX78
91 Imaging
32 Features
18 Overall
26
95 Imaging
35 Features
31 Overall
33
Kodak Z915 vs Panasonic FX78 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-350mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 194g - 90 x 64 x 39mm
- Introduced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-120mm (F2.5-5.9) lens
- 142g - 100 x 55 x 21mm
- Launched January 2011
- Additionally Known as Lumix DMC-FX77
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Kodak Z915 vs Panasonic FX78 Overview
Below, we are matching up the Kodak Z915 vs Panasonic FX78, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by competitors Kodak and Panasonic. The image resolution of the Z915 (10MP) and the FX78 (12MP) is very close and they come with the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe Z915 was unveiled 24 months earlier than the FX78 making the cameras a generation apart from one another. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a quick overview of how the Z915 scores versus the FX78 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Kodak Z915 vs Panasonic FX78 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Kodak EasyShare Z915 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX78. The full galleries are viewable at Kodak Z915 Gallery & Panasonic FX78 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Z915 over the Panasonic FX78
| Z915 | FX78 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic FX78 over the Kodak Z915
| FX78 | Z915 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2011 |  | January 2009 | More recent by 24 months |
| Display dimension | 3.5" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+1") |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Kodak Z915 and Panasonic FX78
| Z915 | FX78 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Equal display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen |
Kodak Z915 vs Panasonic FX78 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you are going to need to consider its weight and measurements. The Kodak Z915 offers outside dimensions of 90mm x 64mm x 39mm (3.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") along with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) while the Panasonic FX78 has proportions of 100mm x 55mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") having a weight of 142 grams (0.31 lbs).
Compare the Kodak Z915 vs Panasonic FX78 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are working with at the time. Underneath is the front view physical size comparison of the Z915 compared to the FX78.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Z915 and FX78 is 91 and 95 respectively.
Kodak Z915 vs Panasonic FX78 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is tough to envision the difference in sensor measurements only by researching a spec sheet. The graphic here may give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the Z915 and FX78.
As you can see, both cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same MP. You can expect to see the Panasonic FX78 to result in more detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop pics much more aggressively. The older Z915 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Kodak Z915 vs Panasonic FX78 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Kodak Z915 vs Panasonic FX78 Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare Z915 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX78 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Kodak | Panasonic |
| Model type | Kodak EasyShare Z915 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX78 |
| Also Known as | - | Lumix DMC-FX77 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2009-01-08 | 2011-01-25 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | Venus Engine FHD |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | 25 | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 35-350mm (10.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.5-4.8 | f/2.5-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 10cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.5 inches | 3.5 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 16s | 60s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1250s | 1/1400s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 2.0 frames/s | 4.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.80 m | 5.60 m |
| Flash options | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 194g (0.43 lbs) | 142g (0.31 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 90 x 64 x 39mm (3.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") | 100 x 55 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 200 pictures |
| Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | 2 x AA | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $200 | $210 |