Kodak Z950 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS
89 Imaging
35 Features
29 Overall
32
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
Kodak Z950 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Boost to 3200)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-350mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 243g - 110 x 67 x 36mm
- Introduced June 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Revealed February 2014
- Newer Model is Ricoh WG-5 GPS
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Kodak Z950 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Overview
Below, we will be analyzing the Kodak Z950 versus Ricoh WG-4 GPS, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by companies Kodak and Ricoh. There is a sizable difference between the sensor resolutions of the Z950 (12MP) and WG-4 GPS (16MP) but they come with the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe Z950 was revealed 4 years before the WG-4 GPS and that is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go through a comprehensive comparison, below is a concise view of how the Z950 grades against the WG-4 GPS when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Kodak Z950 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Kodak EasyShare Z950 & Ricoh WG-4 GPS. The full galleries are provided at Kodak Z950 Gallery & Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Z950 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| Z950 | WG-4 GPS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Kodak Z950
| WG-4 GPS | Z950 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2014 |  | June 2010 | Fresher by 44 months |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak Z950 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| Z950 | WG-4 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial precise focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lack of Touch screen |
Kodak Z950 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry your camera regularly, you'll have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Kodak Z950 enjoys physical measurements of 110mm x 67mm x 36mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") having a weight of 243 grams (0.54 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-4 GPS has dimensions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs).
Take a look at the Kodak Z950 versus Ricoh WG-4 GPS in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are using at the time. The following is the front view dimensions comparison of the Z950 versus the WG-4 GPS.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the Z950 and WG-4 GPS is 89 and 90 respectively.
Kodak Z950 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Sensor Comparison
Often, it's tough to visualize the contrast between sensor sizing simply by reviewing specifications. The graphic underneath will provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the Z950 and WG-4 GPS.
Plainly, both of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different megapixels. You can expect the Ricoh WG-4 GPS to offer extra detail because of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop pictures much more aggressively. The older Z950 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Kodak Z950 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Kodak Z950 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare Z950 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Kodak | Ricoh |
| Model type | Kodak EasyShare Z950 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2010-06-16 | 2014-02-05 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | 3200 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 35-350mm (10.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.5-4.8 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 6cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 1/8 secs | 4 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1250 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 2.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.40 m | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 243g (0.54 lbs) | 235g (0.52 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 110 x 67 x 36mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 240 pictures |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | KLIC-7003 | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at launch | $250 | $210 |
