Kodak Z980 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS
68 Imaging
34 Features
40 Overall
36
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
Kodak Z980 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-624mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 445g - 124 x 91 x 105mm
- Introduced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Revealed December 2012
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Kodak Z980 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview
Here is a extensive assessment of the Kodak Z980 versus Olympus XZ-2 iHS, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Kodak and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the Z980 (12MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) is very well matched but the Z980 (1/2.3") and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") use different sensor measurements.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe Z980 was launched 5 years earlier than the XZ-2 iHS and that is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go through a in depth comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the Z980 grades vs the XZ-2 iHS when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Kodak Z980 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Kodak EasyShare Z980 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS. The complete galleries are provided at Kodak Z980 Gallery and Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Z980 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| Z980 | XZ-2 iHS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Kodak Z980
| XZ-2 iHS | Z980 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | December 2012 |  | January 2009 | Fresher by 48 months |
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 201k | Clearer display (+719k dot) |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Kodak Z980 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| Z980 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very precise focusing | ||
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen |
Kodak Z980 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry your camera frequently, you need to consider its weight and measurements. The Kodak Z980 enjoys external dimensions of 124mm x 91mm x 105mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 4.1") along with a weight of 445 grams (0.98 lbs) while the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has proportions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") along with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).
Check out the Kodak Z980 versus Olympus XZ-2 iHS in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have chosen at that moment. The following is the front view overall size comparison of the Z980 against the XZ-2 iHS.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the Z980 and XZ-2 iHS is 68 and 85 respectively.
Kodak Z980 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be difficult to imagine the difference between sensor sizing simply by looking at technical specs. The visual below will provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Z980 and XZ-2 iHS.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras offer the same exact resolution but different sensor sizing. The Z980 features the tinier sensor which will make achieving shallower depth of field more challenging. The older Z980 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Kodak Z980 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Kodak Z980 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare Z980 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Kodak | Olympus |
| Model type | Kodak EasyShare Z980 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2009-01-05 | 2012-12-18 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 25 | 35 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-624mm (24.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8-5.0 | f/1.8-2.5 |
| Macro focusing range | 10cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 201 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 16s | 60s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 6.30 m | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
| Flash options | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 445 grams (0.98 lb) | 346 grams (0.76 lb) |
| Dimensions | 124 x 91 x 105mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 4.1") | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | 49 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 20.4 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.3 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 216 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 340 photographs |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | Li-90B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail pricing | $249 | $450 |