Kodak Z980 vs Sigma Quattro
68 Imaging
35 Features
40 Overall
37
63 Imaging
69 Features
56 Overall
63
Kodak Z980 vs Sigma Quattro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-624mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 445g - 124 x 91 x 105mm
- Introduced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 29MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sigma SA Mount
- 625g - 147 x 95 x 91mm
- Announced February 2016
Kodak Z980 vs Sigma Quattro Overview
Let's look a bit more closely at the Kodak Z980 and Sigma Quattro, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by manufacturers Kodak and Sigma. There exists a huge gap between the image resolutions of the Z980 (12MP) and Quattro (29MP) and the Z980 (1/2.3") and Quattro (APS-C) feature different sensor sizes.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe Z980 was announced 8 years before the Quattro and that is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Kodak Z980 being a Compact camera and the Sigma Quattro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going in to a detailed comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the Z980 grades against the Quattro with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Kodak Z980 vs Sigma Quattro Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Kodak EasyShare Z980 and Sigma sd Quattro. The whole galleries are provided at Kodak Z980 Gallery and Sigma Quattro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Z980 over the Sigma Quattro
Z980 | Quattro |
---|
Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro over the Kodak Z980
Quattro | Z980 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2016 | January 2009 | Fresher by 86 months | |
Screen resolution | 1620k | 201k | Clearer screen (+1419k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak Z980 and Sigma Quattro
Z980 | Quattro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More accurate focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Lacking Touch screen |
Kodak Z980 vs Sigma Quattro Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry your camera frequently, you need to factor its weight and measurements. The Kodak Z980 enjoys exterior dimensions of 124mm x 91mm x 105mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 4.1") having a weight of 445 grams (0.98 lbs) while the Sigma Quattro has proportions of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") with a weight of 625 grams (1.38 lbs).
Analyze the Kodak Z980 and Sigma Quattro in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have attached at the time. The following is the front view scale comparison of the Z980 vs the Quattro.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Z980 and Quattro is 68 and 63 respectively.
Kodak Z980 vs Sigma Quattro Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is hard to picture the contrast between sensor sizing only by reading through technical specs. The photograph underneath might offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the Z980 and Quattro.
As you can tell, each of these cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The Z980 with its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field more difficult and the Sigma Quattro will give you extra detail with its extra 17 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop photographs far more aggressively. The older Z980 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Kodak Z980 vs Sigma Quattro Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Kodak Z980 vs Sigma Quattro Specifications
Kodak EasyShare Z980 | Sigma sd Quattro | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Kodak | Sigma |
Model type | Kodak EasyShare Z980 | Sigma sd Quattro |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Advanced Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2009-01-05 | 2016-02-23 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Dual TRUE III |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 29MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 5424 x 3616 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 25 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
Lens zoom range | 26-624mm (24.0x) | - |
Max aperture | f/2.8-5.0 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 10cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 76 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 201 thousand dot | 1,620 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.73x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 16 seconds | 30 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames/s | 3.8 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 6.30 m | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | - |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | - |
Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 445 grams (0.98 lbs) | 625 grams (1.38 lbs) |
Dimensions | 124 x 91 x 105mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 4.1") | 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | 4 x AA | BP-61 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $249 | $738 |