Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus XZ-10
95 Imaging
39 Features
35 Overall
37
91 Imaging
36 Features
57 Overall
44
Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus XZ-10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F) lens
- 150g - 101 x 58 x 19mm
- Launched September 2011
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F1.8-2.7) lens
- 221g - 102 x 61 x 34mm
- Released January 2013
Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus XZ-10 Overview
On this page, we will be matching up the Kodak Easyshare M5370 and Olympus XZ-10, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by brands Kodak and Olympus. There is a considerable difference between the resolutions of the Easyshare M5370 (16MP) and XZ-10 (12MP) but both cameras offer the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe Easyshare M5370 was announced 16 months prior to the XZ-10 which makes them a generation away from each other. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting into a detailed comparison, here is a simple summary of how the Easyshare M5370 grades vs the XZ-10 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus XZ-10 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Kodak Easyshare M5370 & Olympus Stylus XZ-10. The whole galleries are provided at Kodak Easyshare M5370 Gallery & Olympus XZ-10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Easyshare M5370 over the Olympus XZ-10
Easyshare M5370 | XZ-10 |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-10 over the Kodak Easyshare M5370
XZ-10 | Easyshare M5370 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2013 | September 2011 | More modern by 16 months | |
Focus manually | More accurate focus | |||
Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Clearer screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak Easyshare M5370 and Olympus XZ-10
Easyshare M5370 | XZ-10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen measurements | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus XZ-10 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you have to factor its weight and size. The Kodak Easyshare M5370 offers outside measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") and a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs) and the Olympus XZ-10 has specifications of 102mm x 61mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") having a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs).
Contrast the Kodak Easyshare M5370 and Olympus XZ-10 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you select during that time. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the Easyshare M5370 against the XZ-10.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the Easyshare M5370 and XZ-10 is 95 and 91 respectively.
Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus XZ-10 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is difficult to imagine the gap between sensor sizes simply by checking a spec sheet. The picture below will offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the Easyshare M5370 and XZ-10.
As you can see, each of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different megapixels. You can expect the Kodak Easyshare M5370 to resolve extra detail with its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The more aged Easyshare M5370 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus XZ-10 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus XZ-10 Specifications
Kodak Easyshare M5370 | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Kodak | Olympus |
Model type | Kodak Easyshare M5370 | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2011-09-14 | 2013-01-30 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 35 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/1.8-2.7 |
Macro focusing range | 5cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 30 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/1600 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 5.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.20 m | - |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps, 18Mbps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps, 9Mbps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-1, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 150 gr (0.33 lbs) | 221 gr (0.49 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 101 x 58 x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 102 x 61 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 240 images |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | KLIC-7006 | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | MicroSD/MicroSDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $160 | $428 |