Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus VG-160
95 Imaging
38 Features
35 Overall
36
96 Imaging
37 Features
26 Overall
32
Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus VG-160 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F) lens
- 150g - 101 x 58 x 19mm
- Introduced September 2011
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Launched January 2012
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus VG-160 Overview
Below, we are contrasting the Kodak Easyshare M5370 and Olympus VG-160, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by manufacturers Kodak and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the Easyshare M5370 (16MP) and the VG-160 (14MP) is fairly similar and they possess the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe Easyshare M5370 was unveiled 3 months earlier than the VG-160 which means that they are of a similar age. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving straight into a full comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the Easyshare M5370 scores vs the VG-160 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus VG-160 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Kodak Easyshare M5370 & Olympus VG-160. The full galleries are provided at Kodak Easyshare M5370 Gallery & Olympus VG-160 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Easyshare M5370 over the Olympus VG-160
| Easyshare M5370 | VG-160 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-160 over the Kodak Easyshare M5370
| VG-160 | Easyshare M5370 |
|---|
Common features in the Kodak Easyshare M5370 and Olympus VG-160
| Easyshare M5370 | VG-160 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | September 2011 |  | January 2012 | Similar age |
| Focus manually |  | No manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display sizing |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Equal display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen |
Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus VG-160 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to travel with your camera, you're going to have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Kodak Easyshare M5370 provides outer dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") along with a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs) and the Olympus VG-160 has dimensions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).
Analyze the Kodak Easyshare M5370 and Olympus VG-160 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have attached at that time. Here is the front view dimension comparison of the Easyshare M5370 vs the VG-160.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Easyshare M5370 and VG-160 is 95 and 96 respectively.
Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus VG-160 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's tough to see the contrast between sensor dimensions just by reading a spec sheet. The picture here might provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the Easyshare M5370 and VG-160.
As you can see, each of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same MP. You can anticipate the Kodak Easyshare M5370 to deliver extra detail having an extra 2MP. Greater resolution will help you crop pics somewhat more aggressively.
Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus VG-160 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus VG-160 Specifications
| Kodak Easyshare M5370 | Olympus VG-160 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Kodak | Olympus |
| Model type | Kodak Easyshare M5370 | Olympus VG-160 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2011-09-14 | 2012-01-10 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | - | f/2.8-6.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 7cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen tech | TFT color LCD | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1600 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.20 m | 4.80 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-1, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 150g (0.33 lbs) | 125g (0.28 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 101 x 58 x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 165 photos |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | KLIC-7006 | LI-70B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | MicroSD/MicroSDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $160 | $90 |