Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Panasonic FZ300
65 Imaging
45 Features
56 Overall
49
59 Imaging
37 Features
73 Overall
51
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Panasonic FZ300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 21MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1560mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 567g - 125 x 114 x 89mm
- Revealed January 2014
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1/16000s Max Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-600mm (F2.8) lens
- 691g - 132 x 92 x 117mm
- Announced July 2015
- Replaced the Panasonic FZ200
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Panasonic FZ300 Overview
Following is a extensive analysis of the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 and Panasonic FZ300, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by brands Kodak and Panasonic. There is a crucial difference between the sensor resolutions of the Astro Zoom AZ651 (21MP) and FZ300 (12MP) but they possess the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe Astro Zoom AZ651 was manufactured 18 months prior to the FZ300 which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. Both cameras come with the identical body type (SLR-like (bridge)).
Before getting straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a simple view of how the Astro Zoom AZ651 matches up against the FZ300 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Panasonic FZ300 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300. The entire galleries are provided at Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Gallery and Panasonic FZ300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 over the Panasonic FZ300
Astro Zoom AZ651 | FZ300 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ300 over the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651
FZ300 | Astro Zoom AZ651 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | July 2015 | January 2014 | More modern by 18 months | |
Screen resolution | 1040k | 920k | Sharper screen (+120k dot) | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 and Panasonic FZ300
Astro Zoom AZ651 | FZ300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More precise focusing | |||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated screen | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen sizing | |
Selfie screen | Both good for selfies |
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Panasonic FZ300 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry around your camera regularly, you have to consider its weight and measurements. The Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 enjoys external measurements of 125mm x 114mm x 89mm (4.9" x 4.5" x 3.5") having a weight of 567 grams (1.25 lbs) while the Panasonic FZ300 has proportions of 132mm x 92mm x 117mm (5.2" x 3.6" x 4.6") having a weight of 691 grams (1.52 lbs).
Look at the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 and Panasonic FZ300 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are working with during that time. Here is the front view measurements comparison of the Astro Zoom AZ651 vs the FZ300.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the Astro Zoom AZ651 and FZ300 is 65 and 59 respectively.
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Panasonic FZ300 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is difficult to imagine the difference between sensor sizes merely by looking at a spec sheet. The pic underneath will help give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the Astro Zoom AZ651 and FZ300.
Clearly, both of those cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different megapixels. You should count on the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 to give extra detail due to its extra 9MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop photographs much more aggressively. The more aged Astro Zoom AZ651 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Panasonic FZ300 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Panasonic FZ300 Specifications
Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Kodak | Panasonic |
Model | Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2014-01-07 | 2015-07-16 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 21 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 25 | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-1560mm (65.0x) | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | f/2.8 |
Macro focus distance | 3cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 920k dot | 1,040k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,440k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | - | 60 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/16000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 9.0 frames/s | 12.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | - | 8.80 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash options | - | Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, forced on, forced on w/redeye reduction, slow sync, slow sync w/redeye reduction, forced off |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 567 gr (1.25 lb) | 691 gr (1.52 lb) |
Dimensions | 125 x 114 x 89mm (4.9" x 4.5" x 3.5") | 132 x 92 x 117mm (5.2" x 3.6" x 4.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 380 shots |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | - | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at release | $419 | $598 |