Leica C vs Olympus TG-820 iHS
92 Imaging
37 Features
59 Overall
45
92 Imaging
35 Features
37 Overall
35
Leica C vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400 (Boost to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-200mm (F2.0-5.9) lens
- 195g - 103 x 63 x 28mm
- Released September 2013
- Alternate Name is Typ112
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Introduced February 2012
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Leica C vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Overview
Let's look a bit more in depth at the Leica C vs Olympus TG-820 iHS, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by brands Leica and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the C (12MP) and the TG-820 iHS (12MP) is relatively comparable but the C (1/1.7") and TG-820 iHS (1/2.3") provide different sensor size.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe C was released 20 months after the TG-820 iHS which makes them a generation away from each other. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving right into a complete comparison, here is a concise overview of how the C matches up versus the TG-820 iHS when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Leica C vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Leica C and Olympus TG-820 iHS. The complete galleries are available at Leica C Gallery and Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica C over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
| C | TG-820 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | September 2013 | February 2012 | More modern by 20 months | |
| Focus manually | Dial precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Leica C
| TG-820 iHS | C | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 1030k | 920k | Crisper screen (+110k dot) |
Common features in the Leica C and Olympus TG-820 iHS
| C | TG-820 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen size | |
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
Leica C vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry around your camera regularly, you will need to think about its weight and measurements. The Leica C has got outside dimensions of 103mm x 63mm x 28mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.1") with a weight of 195 grams (0.43 lbs) while the Olympus TG-820 iHS has proportions of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).
Contrast the Leica C vs Olympus TG-820 iHS in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you use at the time. Below is a front view size comparison of the C and the TG-820 iHS.

Using size and weight, the portability rating of the C and TG-820 iHS is 92 and 92 respectively.
Leica C vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's difficult to imagine the difference in sensor sizes merely by going through specs. The picture here might provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the C and TG-820 iHS.
All in all, each of the cameras provide the same MP albeit different sensor sizes. The C has got the bigger sensor which will make obtaining shallow DOF easier. The newer C should have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
Leica C vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Leica C vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Specifications
| Leica C | Olympus TG-820 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Leica | Olympus |
| Model type | Leica C | Olympus TG-820 iHS |
| Also referred to as | Typ112 | - |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Released | 2013-09-08 | 2012-02-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | TruePic VI |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Max boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-200mm (7.1x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.0-5.9 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 3cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 920 thousand dots | 1,030 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display tech | TFT Color LCD | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 200 thousand dots | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 1% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 10.0fps | 5.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.00 m | 3.50 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720p (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, AVCHD | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 195 grams (0.43 lbs) | 206 grams (0.45 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 103 x 63 x 28mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.1") | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 250 shots | 220 shots |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $1,299 | $500 |