Leica D-LUX 5 vs Olympus FE-4000
88 Imaging
35 Features
44 Overall
38
95 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
Leica D-LUX 5 vs Olympus FE-4000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-90mm (F2.0-3.3) lens
- 271g - 110 x 66 x 43mm
- Released September 2010
- Successor is Leica D-Lux 6
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
- 136g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
- Announced July 2009
- Additionally Known as X-925
Leica D-LUX 5 vs Olympus FE-4000 Overview
Let's examine more closely at the Leica D-LUX 5 vs Olympus FE-4000, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by brands Leica and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the D-LUX 5 (10MP) and the FE-4000 (12MP) is fairly well matched but the D-LUX 5 (1/1.63") and FE-4000 (1/2.3") feature different sensor measurements.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe D-LUX 5 was unveiled 15 months later than the FE-4000 making the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going in to a thorough comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the D-LUX 5 scores vs the FE-4000 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Leica D-LUX 5 vs Olympus FE-4000 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Leica D-LUX 5 & Olympus FE-4000. The full galleries are viewable at Leica D-LUX 5 Gallery & Olympus FE-4000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica D-LUX 5 over the Olympus FE-4000
D-LUX 5 | FE-4000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2010 | July 2009 | Fresher by 15 months | |
Manually focus | Dial precise focus | |||
Display dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-4000 over the Leica D-LUX 5
FE-4000 | D-LUX 5 |
---|
Common features in the Leica D-LUX 5 and Olympus FE-4000
D-LUX 5 | FE-4000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither includes Touch friendly display |
Leica D-LUX 5 vs Olympus FE-4000 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry your camera regularly, you will want to factor in its weight and measurements. The Leica D-LUX 5 features external measurements of 110mm x 66mm x 43mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.7") and a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs) while the Olympus FE-4000 has proportions of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 136 grams (0.30 lbs).
Analyze the Leica D-LUX 5 vs Olympus FE-4000 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are using at that moment. Below is the front view overall size comparison of the D-LUX 5 compared to the FE-4000.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the D-LUX 5 and FE-4000 is 88 and 95 respectively.
Leica D-LUX 5 vs Olympus FE-4000 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be tough to visualize the difference between sensor sizing purely by checking specs. The photograph underneath should give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the D-LUX 5 and FE-4000.
As you can plainly see, both cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The D-LUX 5 having a larger sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF less difficult and the Olympus FE-4000 will give extra detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The more recent D-LUX 5 should have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
Leica D-LUX 5 vs Olympus FE-4000 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Leica D-LUX 5 vs Olympus FE-4000 Specifications
Leica D-LUX 5 | Olympus FE-4000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Leica | Olympus |
Model | Leica D-LUX 5 | Olympus FE-4000 |
Also called | - | X-925 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2010-09-21 | 2009-07-22 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.63" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 8.07 x 5.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 44.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3968 x 2976 |
Max native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 23 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-90mm (3.8x) | 26-105mm (4.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.0-3.3 | f/2.6-5.9 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 3cm |
Crop factor | 4.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 7.20 m | 4.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video data format | AVCHD Lite, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 271 gr (0.60 lbs) | 136 gr (0.30 lbs) |
Dimensions | 110 x 66 x 43mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.7") | 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (12 seconds) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch price | $799 | $130 |