Leica M-E Typ 220 vs OM System OM-1
79 Imaging
65 Features
28 Overall
50
65 Imaging
64 Features
96 Overall
76
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs OM System OM-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 18MP - Full frame Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 2500
- No Video
- Leica M Mount
- 585g - 139 x 80 x 37mm
- Announced September 2012
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3.00" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600 (Boost to 102400)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 599g - 135 x 92 x 73mm
- Launched February 2022
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs OM System OM-1 Overview
Let's look a bit more in depth at the Leica M-E Typ 220 and OM System OM-1, both Pro Mirrorless cameras by competitors Leica and Olympus. The resolution of the M-E Typ 220 (18MP) and the OM System OM-1 (20MP) is pretty close but the M-E Typ 220 (Full frame) and OM System OM-1 (Four Thirds) boast different sensor dimensions.
Europe Approves Revolutionary AI LegislationThe M-E Typ 220 was brought out 10 years prior to the OM System OM-1 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Leica M-E Typ 220 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the OM System OM-1 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a short overview of how the M-E Typ 220 grades versus the OM System OM-1 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs OM System OM-1 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Leica M-E Typ 220 and OM System OM-1. The entire galleries are available at Leica M-E Typ 220 Gallery and OM System OM-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica M-E Typ 220 over the OM System OM-1
M-E Typ 220 | OM System OM-1 |
---|
Reasons to pick OM System OM-1 over the Leica M-E Typ 220
OM System OM-1 | M-E Typ 220 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2022 | September 2012 | More recent by 114 months | |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen dimensions | 3.00" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 1620k | 230k | Crisper screen (+1390k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Leica M-E Typ 220 and OM System OM-1
M-E Typ 220 | OM System OM-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More accurate focusing |
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs OM System OM-1 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to lug around your camera regularly, you should think about its weight and volume. The Leica M-E Typ 220 has outside measurements of 139mm x 80mm x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") with a weight of 585 grams (1.29 lbs) while the OM System OM-1 has sizing of 135mm x 92mm x 73mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.9") accompanied by a weight of 599 grams (1.32 lbs).
Look at the Leica M-E Typ 220 and OM System OM-1 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Following is a front view measurements comparison of the M-E Typ 220 versus the OM System OM-1.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the M-E Typ 220 and OM System OM-1 is 79 and 65 respectively.
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs OM System OM-1 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its tough to picture the gap in sensor measurements merely by viewing technical specs. The visual here might offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the M-E Typ 220 and OM System OM-1.
As you have seen, each of these cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The M-E Typ 220 due to its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field less difficult and the OM System OM-1 will provide you with extra detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop shots a bit more aggressively. The older M-E Typ 220 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs OM System OM-1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs OM System OM-1 Specifications
Leica M-E Typ 220 | OM System OM-1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Leica | Olympus |
Model | Leica M-E Typ 220 | OM System OM-1 |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
Announced | 2012-09-17 | 2022-02-15 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | Stacked BSI Live MOS Sensor |
Sensor size | Full frame | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 36 x 24mm | 17.4 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 864.0mm² | 226.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 18 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 4:3 |
Peak resolution | 5212 x 3472 | 5184 x 3888 |
Highest native ISO | 2500 | 25600 |
Highest enhanced ISO | - | 102400 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 200 |
RAW images | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 1053 |
Cross focus points | - | 1053 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Leica M | Micro Four Thirds |
Number of lenses | 59 | 118 |
Focal length multiplier | 1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Display diagonal | 2.5 inch | 3.00 inch |
Display resolution | 230k dots | 1,620k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display technology | TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (rangefinder) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 5,760k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | 0.83x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 60 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
Max quiet shutter speed | - | 1/32000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 2.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | 1/250 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Highest video resolution | None | 4096x2160 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4, H.264, H.265, HEVC |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 585 grams (1.29 lb) | 599 grams (1.32 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 139 x 80 x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") | 135 x 92 x 73mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 69 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 22.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 11.7 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 787 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 520 pictures |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | BLX-1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II on first slot) |
Card slots | 1 | Two |
Retail price | $0 | $2,199 |