Leica M-Monochrom vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC
78 Imaging
65 Features
23 Overall
48
85 Imaging
34 Features
48 Overall
39
Leica M-Monochrom vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 18MP - Full frame Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 160 - 10000
- No Video
- Leica M Mount
- 600g - 139 x 80 x 37mm
- Released May 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 367g - 114 x 58 x 50mm
- Introduced August 2010
Leica M-Monochrom vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Overview
Lets look much closer at the Leica M-Monochrom vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by competitors Leica and Ricoh. There is a significant difference among the sensor resolutions of the M-Monochrom (18MP) and GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC (10MP) and the M-Monochrom (Full frame) and GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor dimensions.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe M-Monochrom was revealed 22 months after the GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC making them a generation away from each other. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before we go right into a complete comparison, here is a brief view of how the M-Monochrom matches up against the GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Leica M-Monochrom vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Leica M-Monochrom and Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC. The full galleries are provided at Leica M-Monochrom Gallery and Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica M-Monochrom over the Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC
M-Monochrom | GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | May 2012 | August 2010 | More modern by 22 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC over the Leica M-Monochrom
GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC | M-Monochrom | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display size | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Clearer display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Leica M-Monochrom and Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC
M-Monochrom | GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More exact focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither comes with Touch friendly display |
Leica M-Monochrom vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry around your camera frequently, you are going to need to take into account its weight and volume. The Leica M-Monochrom comes with outer dimensions of 139mm x 80mm x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 600 grams (1.32 lbs) and the Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC has sizing of 114mm x 58mm x 50mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 2.0") and a weight of 367 grams (0.81 lbs).
Contrast the Leica M-Monochrom vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are working with at that moment. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the M-Monochrom compared to the GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the M-Monochrom and GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC is 78 and 85 respectively.
Leica M-Monochrom vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is difficult to visualise the gap in sensor sizes simply by researching a spec sheet. The picture below should give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the M-Monochrom and GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC.
As you can see, the two cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The M-Monochrom using its larger sensor will make shooting shallower DOF easier and the Leica M-Monochrom will render more detail because of its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The fresher M-Monochrom will have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Leica M-Monochrom vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Leica M-Monochrom vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Specifications
Leica M-Monochrom | Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Leica | Ricoh |
Model type | Leica M-Monochrom | Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Released | 2012-05-10 | 2010-08-06 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Full frame | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 36 x 24mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 864.0mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 18 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 5212 x 3472 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 10000 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 160 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Leica M | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.6 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 59 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen technology | TFT color LCD with a sapphire glass LCD cover | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (rangefinder) | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 32 secs | 30 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 2.0fps | 5.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 4.50 m |
Flash settings | Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 600 gr (1.32 pounds) | 367 gr (0.81 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 139 x 80 x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") | 114 x 58 x 50mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 2.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photographs | 440 photographs |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $7,950 | $147 |