Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-M1 III
77 Imaging
72 Features
35 Overall
57
67 Imaging
62 Features
96 Overall
75
Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-M1 III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 6400
- Leica M Mount
- 600g - 139 x 80 x 42mm
- Introduced November 2015
- Also referred to as Typ 262
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 580g - 134 x 91 x 69mm
- Revealed February 2020
- Old Model is Olympus E-M1 II
Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-M1 III Overview
Following is a complete analysis of the Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-M1 III, both Pro Mirrorless digital cameras by competitors Leica and Olympus. The resolution of the M Typ 262 (24MP) and the E-M1 III (20MP) is very well matched but the M Typ 262 (Full frame) and E-M1 III (Four Thirds) have different sensor sizes.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe M Typ 262 was revealed 5 years before the E-M1 III which is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Leica M Typ 262 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus E-M1 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the M Typ 262 matches up against the E-M1 III in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-M1 III Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Leica M Typ 262 and Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III. The full galleries are available at Leica M Typ 262 Gallery and Olympus E-M1 III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica M Typ 262 over the Olympus E-M1 III
M Typ 262 | E-M1 III |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 III over the Leica M Typ 262
E-M1 III | M Typ 262 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2020 | November 2015 | More modern by 51 months | |
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display resolution | 1037k | 921k | Clearer display (+116k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Leica M Typ 262 and Olympus E-M1 III
M Typ 262 | E-M1 III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very precise focus | |||
Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display dimensions |
Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-M1 III Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry around your camera, you're going to have to think about its weight and measurements. The Leica M Typ 262 features outside dimensions of 139mm x 80mm x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") with a weight of 600 grams (1.32 lbs) and the Olympus E-M1 III has proportions of 134mm x 91mm x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") and a weight of 580 grams (1.28 lbs).
Look at the Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-M1 III in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you choose at that time. Below is a front view dimensions comparison of the M Typ 262 versus the E-M1 III.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the M Typ 262 and E-M1 III is 77 and 67 respectively.
Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-M1 III Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's tough to picture the gap between sensor sizes just by reading through technical specs. The image underneath may give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the M Typ 262 and E-M1 III.
As you have seen, the two cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The M Typ 262 with its larger sensor is going to make getting bokeh simpler and the Leica M Typ 262 will resolve greater detail because of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop images more aggressively. The more aged M Typ 262 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-M1 III Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-M1 III Specifications
Leica M Typ 262 | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Leica | Olympus |
Model | Leica M Typ 262 | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III |
Otherwise known as | Typ 262 | - |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2015-11-19 | 2020-02-11 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Maestro | TruePic IX |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Full frame | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 35.8 x 23.9mm | 17.4 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 855.6mm² | 226.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 4:3 |
Highest Possible resolution | 5952 x 3976 | 5184 x 3888 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 200 |
RAW support | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | 100 | 64 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 121 |
Cross focus points | - | 121 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Leica M | Micro Four Thirds |
Number of lenses | 59 | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 921k dot | 1,037k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (rangefinder) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
Fastest silent shutter speed | - | 1/32000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames/s | 60.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | no built-in flash | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | - | 1/250 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Maximum video resolution | - | 4096x2160 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | Optional | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 600 gr (1.32 lbs) | 580 gr (1.28 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 139 x 80 x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") | 134 x 91 x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 420 photos |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BP-SCL2 | BLH-1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II on first slot) |
Storage slots | 1 | Dual |
Launch cost | $5,069 | $1,800 |