Clicky

Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-PL3

Portability
77
Imaging
72
Features
35
Overall
57
Leica M Typ 262 front
 
Olympus PEN E-PL3 front
Portability
88
Imaging
48
Features
52
Overall
49

Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-PL3 Key Specs

Leica M Typ 262
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - Full frame Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 200 - 6400
  • Leica M Mount
  • 600g - 139 x 80 x 42mm
  • Launched November 2015
  • Also referred to as Typ 262
Olympus E-PL3
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 200 - 12800
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 313g - 110 x 64 x 37mm
  • Announced September 2011
  • Previous Model is Olympus E-PL2
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-PL3 Overview

On this page, we will be analyzing the Leica M Typ 262 and Olympus E-PL3, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by manufacturers Leica and Olympus. There exists a big gap among the sensor resolutions of the M Typ 262 (24MP) and E-PL3 (12MP) and the M Typ 262 (Full frame) and E-PL3 (Four Thirds) have totally different sensor size.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The M Typ 262 was unveiled 4 years after the E-PL3 which is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).

Before getting into a more detailed comparison, here is a short overview of how the M Typ 262 scores against the E-PL3 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Leica M Typ 262 over the Olympus E-PL3

 M Typ 262 E-PL3 
AnnouncedNovember 2015September 2011Newer by 51 months
Screen resolution921k460kCrisper screen (+461k dot)

Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL3 over the Leica M Typ 262

 E-PL3 M Typ 262 
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen

Common features in the Leica M Typ 262 and Olympus E-PL3

 M Typ 262 E-PL3 
Focus manually More exact focus
Screen dimensions3"3"Equal screen size
Selfie screen Neither includes selfie screen
Touch screen Neither includes Touch screen

Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-PL3 Physical Comparison

In case you're aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you should consider its weight and measurements. The Leica M Typ 262 features physical dimensions of 139mm x 80mm x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") along with a weight of 600 grams (1.32 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-PL3 has proportions of 110mm x 64mm x 37mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.5") along with a weight of 313 grams (0.69 lbs).

Contrast the Leica M Typ 262 and Olympus E-PL3 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are utilising during that time. Underneath is a front view proportions comparison of the M Typ 262 and the E-PL3.

Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-PL3 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the M Typ 262 and E-PL3 is 77 and 88 respectively.

Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-PL3 top view buttons comparison

Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-PL3 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it is very tough to visualise the contrast in sensor dimensions merely by seeing technical specs. The pic underneath will offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the M Typ 262 and E-PL3.

As you have seen, each of these cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The M Typ 262 with its bigger sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field easier and the Leica M Typ 262 will show more detail having an extra 12 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop shots more aggressively. The younger M Typ 262 is going to have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.

Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-PL3 sensor size comparison

Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-PL3 Screen and ViewFinder

Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-PL3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Leica M Typ 262 Portrait photography factors
Olympus E-PL3 Portrait photography factors
75
manual focus
sensor resolution is decent (24MP)
sensor size is great (Full frame)
exports RAW files
no liveview
60
you can focus manually
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports face detect focusing
saves RAW files
MP count low (12 megapixels)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Leica M Typ 262 Street photography info
Olympus E-PL3 Street photography info
66
sensor size is great (Full frame)
exports RAW files
fixed screen
lack of image stabilization
84
screen tilts
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Leica M Typ 262
Sports photography with Olympus E-PL3
50
sensor resolution is decent (24 megapixels)
sensor size is great (Full frame)
no liveview
very slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority
lack of image stabilization
lacks phase detect AF
45
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports tracking focus
painfully slow continuous shooting (6.0 frames per second)
MP count low (12 megapixels)
not so great battery (300 shots)
doesn't have phase detect AF
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Leica M Typ 262
Travel photography with Olympus E-PL3
58
sensor resolution is decent (24 megapixels)
no Time Lapse mode
screen isn't selfie friendly
44
doesn't have Time Lapse function
not so great battery (300 per charge)
MP count low (12 megapixels)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Leica M Typ 262
Landscape photography with Olympus E-PL3
69
manual focus
swap lenses (Leica M mount)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
sensor resolution is decent (24MP)
sensor size is great (Full frame)
exports RAW files
no liveview
lack of image stabilization
no Time Lapse mode
61
you can focus manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
good sized screen (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
MP count low (12MP)
not so great battery (300 CIPA)
doesn't have Time Lapse function
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Leica M Typ 262
Vlogging with Olympus E-PL3
22
screen isn't selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
low video resolution ( pixels)
no external mic socket
34
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
supports face detect focusing
high quality video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
doesn't have mic port
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-PL3 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Leica M Typ 262 and Olympus E-PL3
 Leica M Typ 262Olympus PEN E-PL3
General Information
Make Leica Olympus
Model Leica M Typ 262 Olympus PEN E-PL3
Also called as Typ 262 -
Type Pro Mirrorless Entry-Level Mirrorless
Launched 2015-11-19 2011-09-20
Body design Rangefinder-style mirrorless Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor Maestro Truepic VI
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Full frame Four Thirds
Sensor dimensions 35.8 x 23.9mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor surface area 855.6mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 24MP 12MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 3:2 4:3
Highest resolution 5952 x 3976 4032 x 3024
Highest native ISO 6400 12800
Minimum native ISO 200 200
RAW pictures
Minimum boosted ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Number of focus points - 35
Lens
Lens mount Leica M Micro Four Thirds
Available lenses 59 107
Focal length multiplier 1 2.1
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Tilting
Display sizing 3 inches 3 inches
Display resolution 921 thousand dot 460 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Display technology - HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (rangefinder) Electronic (optional)
Viewfinder magnification 0.68x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 seconds 60 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 3.0 frames per second 6.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range no built-in flash no built-in flash
Flash modes no built-in flash Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels)
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Maximum flash sync - 1/160 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution - 1920x1080
Video format - AVCHD, Motion JPEG
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS Optional None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 600 grams (1.32 pounds) 313 grams (0.69 pounds)
Physical dimensions 139 x 80 x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") 110 x 64 x 37mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.5")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested 52
DXO Color Depth score not tested 20.9
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 10.3
DXO Low light score not tested 499
Other
Battery life - 300 shots
Type of battery - Battery Pack
Battery model BP-SCL2 BLS-5
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots 1 1
Pricing at launch $5,069 $399