Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-PM2
77 Imaging
70 Features
35 Overall
56
89 Imaging
51 Features
63 Overall
55
Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-PM2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 6400
- Leica M Mount
- 600g - 139 x 80 x 42mm
- Announced November 2015
- Alternate Name is Typ 262
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 269g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
- Released May 2013
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-PM1
Photography Glossary Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-PM2 Overview
Below is a detailed comparison of the Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-PM2, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands Leica and Olympus. There is a huge difference between the image resolutions of the M Typ 262 (24MP) and E-PM2 (16MP) and the M Typ 262 (Full frame) and E-PM2 (Four Thirds) provide different sensor measurements.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe M Typ 262 was manufactured 2 years later than the E-PM2 and that is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before going right into a complete comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the M Typ 262 scores versus the E-PM2 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-PM2 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Leica M Typ 262 and Olympus PEN E-PM2. The entire galleries are viewable at Leica M Typ 262 Gallery and Olympus E-PM2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica M Typ 262 over the Olympus E-PM2
| M Typ 262 | E-PM2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | November 2015 | May 2013 | More recent by 31 months | |
| Screen resolution | 921k | 460k | Clearer screen (+461k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM2 over the Leica M Typ 262
| E-PM2 | M Typ 262 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Leica M Typ 262 and Olympus E-PM2
| M Typ 262 | E-PM2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | More accurate focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen measurements | |
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen |
Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-PM2 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to lug around your camera often, you will want to factor in its weight and measurements. The Leica M Typ 262 comes with outside measurements of 139mm x 80mm x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") having a weight of 600 grams (1.32 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-PM2 has proportions of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs).
See the Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-PM2 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have attached at that time. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the M Typ 262 compared to the E-PM2.

Using size and weight, the portability grade of the M Typ 262 and E-PM2 is 77 and 89 respectively.
Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-PM2 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is hard to picture the gap between sensor measurements only by going over a spec sheet. The graphic underneath will offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the M Typ 262 and E-PM2.
As you can see, both the cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The M Typ 262 because of its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field less difficult and the Leica M Typ 262 will deliver more detail due to its extra 8MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The younger M Typ 262 provides an advantage in sensor technology.
Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-PM2 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera
Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-PM2 Specifications
| Leica M Typ 262 | Olympus PEN E-PM2 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Leica | Olympus |
| Model type | Leica M Typ 262 | Olympus PEN E-PM2 |
| Also called as | Typ 262 | - |
| Class | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Announced | 2015-11-19 | 2013-05-21 |
| Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Maestro | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Full frame | Four Thirds |
| Sensor measurements | 35.8 x 23.9mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
| Sensor surface area | 855.6mm² | 224.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 24MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 4:3 |
| Max resolution | 5952 x 3976 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 200 | 200 |
| RAW format | ||
| Lowest enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 35 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Leica M | Micro Four Thirds |
| Total lenses | 59 | 107 |
| Focal length multiplier | 1 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 921k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (rangefinder) | Electronic (optional) |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | - |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames per sec | 8.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) |
| Flash settings | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Max flash sync | - | 1/250s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | - | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | - | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Optional | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 600 gr (1.32 pounds) | 269 gr (0.59 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 139 x 80 x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") | 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | 72 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.7 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.2 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 932 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 360 photos |
| Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | BP-SCL2 | BLS-5 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $5,069 | $448 |