Leica M Typ 262 vs Panasonic FH1
77 Imaging
72 Features
35 Overall
57
95 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
Leica M Typ 262 vs Panasonic FH1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 6400
- Leica M Mount
- 600g - 139 x 80 x 42mm
- Announced November 2015
- Alternative Name is Typ 262
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F2.8-6.9) lens
- 163g - 98 x 55 x 23mm
- Released January 2010
- Other Name is Lumix DMC-FS10
Leica M Typ 262 vs Panasonic FH1 Overview
Below, we are matching up the Leica M Typ 262 versus Panasonic FH1, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Leica and Panasonic. There exists a crucial gap between the image resolutions of the M Typ 262 (24MP) and FH1 (12MP) and the M Typ 262 (Full frame) and FH1 (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor sizes.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe M Typ 262 was announced 5 years later than the FH1 and that is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Leica M Typ 262 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FH1 being a Compact camera.
Before going in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a simple overview of how the M Typ 262 matches up versus the FH1 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Leica M Typ 262 vs Panasonic FH1 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Leica M Typ 262 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH1. The whole galleries are provided at Leica M Typ 262 Gallery and Panasonic FH1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica M Typ 262 over the Panasonic FH1
M Typ 262 | FH1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | November 2015 | January 2010 | More recent by 72 months | |
Focus manually | Very exact focus | |||
Display dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 921k | 230k | Crisper display (+691k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FH1 over the Leica M Typ 262
FH1 | M Typ 262 |
---|
Common features in the Leica M Typ 262 and Panasonic FH1
M Typ 262 | FH1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither includes Touch friendly display |
Leica M Typ 262 vs Panasonic FH1 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to lug around your camera, you'll have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Leica M Typ 262 features physical dimensions of 139mm x 80mm x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") having a weight of 600 grams (1.32 lbs) while the Panasonic FH1 has dimensions of 98mm x 55mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") along with a weight of 163 grams (0.36 lbs).
Check the Leica M Typ 262 versus Panasonic FH1 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you choose at that time. The following is the front view sizing comparison of the M Typ 262 vs the FH1.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the M Typ 262 and FH1 is 77 and 95 respectively.
Leica M Typ 262 vs Panasonic FH1 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be tough to visualize the gap between sensor measurements merely by going over a spec sheet. The photograph underneath should offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the M Typ 262 and FH1.
Clearly, the 2 cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The M Typ 262 having a larger sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF less difficult and the Leica M Typ 262 will offer more detail with its extra 12 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop photos much more aggressively. The more modern M Typ 262 provides an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
Leica M Typ 262 vs Panasonic FH1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Leica M Typ 262 vs Panasonic FH1 Specifications
Leica M Typ 262 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Leica | Panasonic |
Model type | Leica M Typ 262 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH1 |
Also referred to as | Typ 262 | Lumix DMC-FS10 |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2015-11-19 | 2010-01-06 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Maestro | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Full frame | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 35.8 x 23.9mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 855.6mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 5952 x 3976 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Leica M | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/2.8-6.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
Number of lenses | 59 | - |
Crop factor | 1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of screen | 921 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (rangefinder) | None |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames per second | 6.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 6.80 m |
Flash options | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | - | 1280x720 |
Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Optional | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 600 grams (1.32 lb) | 163 grams (0.36 lb) |
Dimensions | 139 x 80 x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") | 98 x 55 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | BP-SCL2 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $5,069 | $150 |