Leica Q vs Ricoh GR
63 Imaging
71 Features
64 Overall
68
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4f261/4f2619411eb3c78d0e047f13878957d0d5fe086d" alt="Leica Q front Leica Q front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/13ebc/13ebc3c2793d203ea2398f0aa96e683a4f696bfe" alt="Ricoh GR front Ricoh GR front"
90 Imaging
57 Features
54 Overall
55
Leica Q vs Ricoh GR Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 50000
- Yes Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F1.7) lens
- 640g - 130 x 80 x 93mm
- Introduced June 2015
- Also referred to as Typ 116
- Newer Model is Leica Q2
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8) lens
- 245g - 117 x 61 x 35mm
- Revealed April 2013
- Replacement is Ricoh GR II
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Leica Q vs Ricoh GR Overview
Below is a extended overview of the Leica Q and Ricoh GR, both Large Sensor Compact cameras by brands Leica and Ricoh. There exists a substantial gap among the resolutions of the Q (24MP) and GR (16MP) and the Q (Full frame) and GR (APS-C) provide totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The Q was unveiled 2 years later than the GR and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Large Sensor Compact).
Before we go into a complete comparison, here is a brief overview of how the Q grades against the GR for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Leica Q vs Ricoh GR Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Leica Q & Ricoh GR. The full galleries are viewable at Leica Q Gallery & Ricoh GR Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica Q over the Ricoh GR
Q | GR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | June 2015 | ![]() | April 2013 | More recent by 27 months |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR over the Leica Q
GR | Q | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 1230k | ![]() | 1040k | Crisper display (+190k dot) |
Common features in the Leica Q and Ricoh GR
Q | GR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial exact focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen |
Leica Q vs Ricoh GR Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Leica Q offers physical dimensions of 130mm x 80mm x 93mm (5.1" x 3.1" x 3.7") having a weight of 640 grams (1.41 lbs) while the Ricoh GR has dimensions of 117mm x 61mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") and a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Contrast the Leica Q and Ricoh GR in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are employing at the time. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the Q against the GR.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7d917/7d9171ef521744ae0e0f82f5f639709e0c31e14d" alt="Leica Q vs Ricoh GR size comparison Leica Q vs Ricoh GR size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Q and GR is 63 and 90 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/af5d7/af5d7ea3f647339e733ae9b6650636f77374655e" alt="Leica Q vs Ricoh GR top view buttons comparison Leica Q vs Ricoh GR top view buttons comparison"
Leica Q vs Ricoh GR Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's tough to visualise the contrast in sensor measurements merely by viewing specs. The graphic underneath will help provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the Q and GR.
All in all, both of these cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The Q with its larger sensor will make achieving shallower DOF easier and the Leica Q will provide you with extra detail having an extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The more recent Q will have an edge in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8229c/8229c53dc12d751aa74ba72504ae2d24f49854ea" alt="Leica Q vs Ricoh GR sensor size comparison Leica Q vs Ricoh GR sensor size comparison"
Leica Q vs Ricoh GR Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/27b20/27b20b3f8a2330c5198e24c2dd4a38b3349bcd09" alt="Leica Q vs Ricoh GR Screen and Viewfinder comparison Leica Q vs Ricoh GR Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Leica Q vs Ricoh GR Specifications
Leica Q | Ricoh GR | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Leica | Ricoh |
Model | Leica Q | Ricoh GR |
Also called as | Typ 116 | - |
Class | Large Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2015-06-10 | 2013-04-17 |
Body design | Large Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Maestro II | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Full frame | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 36 x 24mm | 23.7 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 864.0mm² | 372.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Full resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 4928 x 3264 |
Max native ISO | 50000 | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28mm (1x) | 28mm (1x) |
Max aperture | f/1.7 | f/2.8 |
Macro focus distance | 17cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 1,040 thousand dot | 1,230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Optical (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 3,680 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.76x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 300 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Highest silent shutter speed | 1/16000 secs | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 10.0fps | 4.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 5.40 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash modes | no built-in flash | - |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | - | 1/4000 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p) | 1920 x 1080 (30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 ( 60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4 | MPEG-4 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 640 grams (1.41 lb) | 245 grams (0.54 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 80 x 93mm (5.1" x 3.1" x 3.7") | 117 x 61 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 85 | 78 |
DXO Color Depth score | 24.3 | 23.6 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.7 | 13.5 |
DXO Low light score | 2221 | 972 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 290 photos |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BP-DC12 | DB65 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD, SDHC, SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $4,300 | $971 |