Leica Q2 Monochrom vs Olympus E-P3
60 Imaging
81 Features
66 Overall
75
86 Imaging
48 Features
60 Overall
52
Leica Q2 Monochrom vs Olympus E-P3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 47MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 100000
- Optical Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- 28mm (F1.7) lens
- 734g - 130 x 80 x 92mm
- Launched October 2020
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 369g - 122 x 69 x 34mm
- Launched August 2011
- Older Model is Olympus E-P2
- Newer Model is Olympus E-P5
Leica Q2 Monochrom vs Olympus E-P3 Overview
On this page, we are reviewing the Leica Q2 Monochrom vs Olympus E-P3, former being a Large Sensor Compact while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies Leica and Olympus. There is a large difference between the resolutions of the Q2 Monochrom (47MP) and E-P3 (12MP) and the Q2 Monochrom (Full frame) and E-P3 (Four Thirds) boast totally different sensor sizes.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe Q2 Monochrom was announced 9 years later than the E-P3 and that is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Leica Q2 Monochrom being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Olympus E-P3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting right into a full comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the Q2 Monochrom matches up versus the E-P3 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Leica Q2 Monochrom vs Olympus E-P3 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Leica Q2 Monochrom & Olympus PEN E-P3. The whole galleries are viewable at Leica Q2 Monochrom Gallery & Olympus E-P3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica Q2 Monochrom over the Olympus E-P3
Q2 Monochrom | E-P3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | October 2020 | August 2011 | Fresher by 112 months | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 614k | Clearer display (+426k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-P3 over the Leica Q2 Monochrom
E-P3 | Q2 Monochrom |
---|
Common features in the Leica Q2 Monochrom and Olympus E-P3
Q2 Monochrom | E-P3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial exact focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Leica Q2 Monochrom vs Olympus E-P3 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry your camera regularly, you need to factor its weight and proportions. The Leica Q2 Monochrom features outside measurements of 130mm x 80mm x 92mm (5.1" x 3.1" x 3.6") with a weight of 734 grams (1.62 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-P3 has measurements of 122mm x 69mm x 34mm (4.8" x 2.7" x 1.3") and a weight of 369 grams (0.81 lbs).
Take a look at the Leica Q2 Monochrom vs Olympus E-P3 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilising at that moment. The following is a front view dimension comparison of the Q2 Monochrom compared to the E-P3.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the Q2 Monochrom and E-P3 is 60 and 86 respectively.
Leica Q2 Monochrom vs Olympus E-P3 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's hard to see the contrast between sensor sizing merely by reading through technical specs. The visual here will provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the Q2 Monochrom and E-P3.
As you have seen, both cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The Q2 Monochrom having a larger sensor will make getting shallower DOF simpler and the Leica Q2 Monochrom will resolve greater detail with its extra 35MP. Greater resolution will help you crop pics a bit more aggressively. The more modern Q2 Monochrom will have a benefit in sensor technology.
Leica Q2 Monochrom vs Olympus E-P3 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Leica Q2 Monochrom vs Olympus E-P3 Specifications
Leica Q2 Monochrom | Olympus PEN E-P3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Leica | Olympus |
Model | Leica Q2 Monochrom | Olympus PEN E-P3 |
Category | Large Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Launched | 2020-10-11 | 2011-08-17 |
Physical type | Large Sensor Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | TruePic VI |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Full frame | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 36 x 24mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 864.0mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 47 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 4:3 |
Max resolution | 8368 x 5584 | 4032 x 3024 |
Max native ISO | 100000 | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 49 | 35 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
Lens focal range | 28mm (1x) | - |
Maximal aperture | f/1.7 | - |
Macro focus distance | 17cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 1,040 thousand dots | 614 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display tech | - | 3:2 OLED with Anti-Fingerprint Coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 3,680 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.76x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Max quiet shutter speed | 1/40000 secs | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 20.0 frames per second | 3.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 10.00 m (@ ISO 200) |
Flash options | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Wireless, Manual (3 levels) |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/500 secs | 1/180 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, AAC | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | AVCHD, Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 734g (1.62 pounds) | 369g (0.81 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 80 x 92mm (5.1" x 3.1" x 3.6") | 122 x 69 x 34mm (4.8" x 2.7" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 51 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 20.8 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 10.1 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 536 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photos | 330 photos |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BP-SCL4 | BLS-5 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at release | $5,995 | $0 |