Leica Q2 Monochrom vs Olympus 6020
60 Imaging
81 Features
66 Overall
75
95 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
Leica Q2 Monochrom vs Olympus 6020 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 47MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 100000
- Optical Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- 28mm (F1.7) lens
- 734g - 130 x 80 x 92mm
- Launched October 2020
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 122g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Announced February 2010
- Additionally referred to as mju Tough 6020
Leica Q2 Monochrom vs Olympus 6020 Overview
Below, we will be looking at the Leica Q2 Monochrom vs Olympus 6020, one is a Large Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers Leica and Olympus. There is a huge difference between the image resolutions of the Q2 Monochrom (47MP) and 6020 (13MP) and the Q2 Monochrom (Full frame) and 6020 (1/2.3") use different sensor dimensions.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe Q2 Monochrom was launched 10 years after the 6020 which is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Leica Q2 Monochrom being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Olympus 6020 being a Compact camera.
Before delving through a thorough comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the Q2 Monochrom grades against the 6020 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Leica Q2 Monochrom vs Olympus 6020 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Leica Q2 Monochrom and Olympus Stylus Tough 6020. The complete galleries are available at Leica Q2 Monochrom Gallery and Olympus 6020 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica Q2 Monochrom over the Olympus 6020
Q2 Monochrom | 6020 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | October 2020 | February 2010 | Newer by 131 months | |
Manual focus | Dial precise focusing | |||
Screen dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 1040k | 230k | Crisper screen (+810k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus 6020 over the Leica Q2 Monochrom
6020 | Q2 Monochrom |
---|
Common features in the Leica Q2 Monochrom and Olympus 6020
Q2 Monochrom | 6020 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen |
Leica Q2 Monochrom vs Olympus 6020 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to travel with your camera, you should think about its weight and volume. The Leica Q2 Monochrom comes with exterior dimensions of 130mm x 80mm x 92mm (5.1" x 3.1" x 3.6") having a weight of 734 grams (1.62 lbs) whilst the Olympus 6020 has sizing of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 122 grams (0.27 lbs).
Look at the Leica Q2 Monochrom vs Olympus 6020 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are employing at that moment. The following is the front view size comparison of the Q2 Monochrom vs the 6020.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the Q2 Monochrom and 6020 is 60 and 95 respectively.
Leica Q2 Monochrom vs Olympus 6020 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is difficult to visualize the difference between sensor dimensions merely by going over technical specs. The picture underneath will offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the Q2 Monochrom and 6020.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The Q2 Monochrom due to its bigger sensor is going to make shooting bokeh simpler and the Leica Q2 Monochrom will offer greater detail utilizing its extra 34MP. Higher resolution will let you crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The younger Q2 Monochrom provides a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
Leica Q2 Monochrom vs Olympus 6020 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Leica Q2 Monochrom vs Olympus 6020 Specifications
Leica Q2 Monochrom | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Leica | Olympus |
Model | Leica Q2 Monochrom | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 |
Also Known as | - | mju Tough 6020 |
Category | Large Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Launched | 2020-10-11 | 2010-02-02 |
Body design | Large Sensor Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Full frame | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 36 x 24mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 864.0mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 47MP | 13MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 8368 x 5584 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 100000 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 49 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28mm (1x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | f/1.7 | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | 17cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Display resolution | 1,040k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 3,680k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.76x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 1/4 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Max quiet shutter speed | 1/40000 secs | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 20.0 frames per sec | 5.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 4.00 m |
Flash options | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/500 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, AAC | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 734g (1.62 lb) | 122g (0.27 lb) |
Dimensions | 130 x 80 x 92mm (5.1" x 3.1" x 3.6") | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photographs | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BP-SCL4 | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail price | $5,995 | $279 |