Leica TL2 vs Olympus E-PL3
85 Imaging
68 Features
64 Overall
66
88 Imaging
48 Features
52 Overall
49
Leica TL2 vs Olympus E-PL3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 50000
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Leica L Mount
- 399g - 134 x 69 x 33mm
- Introduced July 2017
- Earlier Model is Leica TL
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 313g - 110 x 64 x 37mm
- Announced September 2011
- Superseded the Olympus E-PL2
Leica TL2 vs Olympus E-PL3 Overview
Below, we will be reviewing the Leica TL2 vs Olympus E-PL3, former is a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies Leica and Olympus. There is a noticeable difference among the resolutions of the TL2 (24MP) and E-PL3 (12MP) and the TL2 (APS-C) and E-PL3 (Four Thirds) feature different sensor sizing.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe TL2 was manufactured 5 years after the E-PL3 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before going straight into a in depth comparison, below is a concise view of how the TL2 scores vs the E-PL3 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Leica TL2 vs Olympus E-PL3 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Leica TL2 & Olympus PEN E-PL3. The entire galleries are provided at Leica TL2 Gallery & Olympus E-PL3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica TL2 over the Olympus E-PL3
TL2 | E-PL3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | July 2017 | September 2011 | More modern by 71 months | |
Screen dimension | 3.7" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.7") | |
Screen resolution | 1230k | 460k | Clearer screen (+770k dot) | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL3 over the Leica TL2
E-PL3 | TL2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Common features in the Leica TL2 and Olympus E-PL3
TL2 | E-PL3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More precise focusing | |||
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen |
Leica TL2 vs Olympus E-PL3 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry around your camera often, you should think about its weight and volume. The Leica TL2 enjoys external measurements of 134mm x 69mm x 33mm (5.3" x 2.7" x 1.3") along with a weight of 399 grams (0.88 lbs) while the Olympus E-PL3 has sizing of 110mm x 64mm x 37mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.5") having a weight of 313 grams (0.69 lbs).
Check out the Leica TL2 vs Olympus E-PL3 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are working with at that moment. Here is the front view physical size comparison of the TL2 versus the E-PL3.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the TL2 and E-PL3 is 85 and 88 respectively.
Leica TL2 vs Olympus E-PL3 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is hard to visualize the contrast in sensor sizes just by going through a spec sheet. The pic here will help offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the TL2 and E-PL3.
Clearly, both the cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The TL2 due to its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Leica TL2 will produce greater detail due to its extra 12MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The younger TL2 provides a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
Leica TL2 vs Olympus E-PL3 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Leica TL2 vs Olympus E-PL3 Specifications
Leica TL2 | Olympus PEN E-PL3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Leica | Olympus |
Model type | Leica TL2 | Olympus PEN E-PL3 |
Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2017-07-10 | 2011-09-20 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Truepic VI |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 23.6 x 15.7mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 370.5mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 4:3 |
Highest resolution | 6016 x 4014 | 4032 x 3024 |
Highest native ISO | 50000 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 49 | 35 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Leica L | Micro Four Thirds |
Number of lenses | 4 | 107 |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display sizing | 3.7 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 1,230k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display tech | - | HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 60 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Highest quiet shutter speed | 1/40000 secs | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 7.0 frames/s | 6.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash options | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | - | 1/160 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, AAC | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4 | AVCHD, Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Optional | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 399 gr (0.88 lbs) | 313 gr (0.69 lbs) |
Dimensions | 134 x 69 x 33mm (5.3" x 2.7" x 1.3") | 110 x 64 x 37mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 52 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 20.9 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 10.3 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 499 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 250 photographs | 300 photographs |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BP-DC13 | BLS-5 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $2,195 | $399 |