Nikon A900 vs Olympus E-M5 II
88 Imaging
46 Features
58 Overall
50
80 Imaging
54 Features
84 Overall
66
Nikon A900 vs Olympus E-M5 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-840mm (F3.4-6.9) lens
- 289g - 113 x 67 x 40mm
- Announced February 2016
- Replacement is Nikon A1000
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 469g - 124 x 85 x 45mm
- Launched February 2015
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M5
- Replacement is Olympus E-M5 III
Nikon A900 vs Olympus E-M5 II Overview
The following is a extended review of the Nikon A900 versus Olympus E-M5 II, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by manufacturers Nikon and Olympus. There exists a considerable gap between the image resolutions of the A900 (20MP) and E-M5 II (16MP) and the A900 (1/2.3") and E-M5 II (Four Thirds) posses totally different sensor sizing.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe A900 was brought out 13 months after the E-M5 II making them a generation away from one another. Both cameras have different body design with the Nikon A900 being a Compact camera and the Olympus E-M5 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting straight to a thorough comparison, here is a concise summary of how the A900 matches up against the E-M5 II in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Nikon A900 vs Olympus E-M5 II Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Nikon Coolpix A900 & Olympus OM-D E-M5 II. The entire galleries are available at Nikon A900 Gallery & Olympus E-M5 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon A900 over the Olympus E-M5 II
A900 | E-M5 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2016 | February 2015 | Newer by 13 months |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 II over the Nikon A900
E-M5 II | A900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More accurate focusing | |||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating display | |
Display resolution | 1037k | 921k | Crisper display (+116k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Nikon A900 and Olympus E-M5 II
A900 | E-M5 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display measurement |
Nikon A900 vs Olympus E-M5 II Physical Comparison
When you are intending to travel with your camera often, you will have to factor its weight and volume. The Nikon A900 comes with exterior measurements of 113mm x 67mm x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") and a weight of 289 grams (0.64 lbs) and the Olympus E-M5 II has sizing of 124mm x 85mm x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") along with a weight of 469 grams (1.03 lbs).
Check the Nikon A900 versus Olympus E-M5 II in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have attached at that moment. Below is a front view proportions comparison of the A900 compared to the E-M5 II.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the A900 and E-M5 II is 88 and 80 respectively.
Nikon A900 vs Olympus E-M5 II Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is difficult to envision the contrast between sensor dimensions simply by reviewing specs. The pic underneath will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the A900 and E-M5 II.
All in all, each of these cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The A900 due to its tinier sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field tougher and the Nikon A900 will deliver more detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images a bit more aggressively. The younger A900 will have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Nikon A900 vs Olympus E-M5 II Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Nikon A900 vs Olympus E-M5 II Specifications
Nikon Coolpix A900 | Olympus OM-D E-M5 II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Nikon | Olympus |
Model | Nikon Coolpix A900 | Olympus OM-D E-M5 II |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Advanced Mirrorless |
Announced | 2016-02-23 | 2015-02-06 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | MOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 200 |
RAW support | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | - | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 81 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
Lens focal range | 24-840mm (35.0x) | - |
Max aperture | f/3.4-6.9 | - |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 107 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Fully Articulated |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 921k dots | 1,037k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 8 seconds | 60 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
Max silent shutter speed | - | 1/16000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 7.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) | no built-in flash |
Flash options | - | Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | - | 1/250 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p, 25p) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 289 gr (0.64 pounds) | 469 gr (1.03 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 113 x 67 x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") | 124 x 85 x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 73 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.0 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.4 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 896 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 pictures | 310 pictures |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | EN-EL12 | BLN-1 |
Self timer | Yes (2, 5, 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at release | $400 | $699 |