Nikon A900 vs Olympus VG-160
88 Imaging
45 Features
58 Overall
50
96 Imaging
37 Features
26 Overall
32
Nikon A900 vs Olympus VG-160 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-840mm (F3.4-6.9) lens
- 289g - 113 x 67 x 40mm
- Announced February 2016
- Later Model is Nikon A1000
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Released January 2012
Photography Glossary Nikon A900 vs Olympus VG-160 Overview
Following is a thorough assessment of the Nikon A900 vs Olympus VG-160, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Nikon and Olympus. There is a sizable difference between the image resolutions of the A900 (20MP) and VG-160 (14MP) but they come with the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe A900 was revealed 4 years after the VG-160 which is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go in to a in depth comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the A900 grades vs the VG-160 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Nikon A900 vs Olympus VG-160 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Nikon Coolpix A900 & Olympus VG-160. The full galleries are available at Nikon A900 Gallery & Olympus VG-160 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon A900 over the Olympus VG-160
| A900 | VG-160 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2016 | January 2012 | More modern by 51 months | |
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
| Display resolution | 921k | 230k | Sharper display (+691k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-160 over the Nikon A900
| VG-160 | A900 |
|---|
Common features in the Nikon A900 and Olympus VG-160
| A900 | VG-160 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Lack of manual focus | |||
| Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display dimensions | |
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Neither provides Touch friendly display |
Nikon A900 vs Olympus VG-160 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry around your camera regularly, you should factor its weight and measurements. The Nikon A900 provides outside measurements of 113mm x 67mm x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") along with a weight of 289 grams (0.64 lbs) while the Olympus VG-160 has proportions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).
Compare the Nikon A900 vs Olympus VG-160 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you choose at the time. The following is the front view proportions comparison of the A900 versus the VG-160.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the A900 and VG-160 is 88 and 96 respectively.
Nikon A900 vs Olympus VG-160 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be hard to see the contrast between sensor sizes only by checking a spec sheet. The pic here should provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the A900 and VG-160.
Clearly, the 2 cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same resolution. You can anticipate the Nikon A900 to give greater detail because of its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop pics much more aggressively. The more recent A900 is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Nikon A900 vs Olympus VG-160 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Nikon A900 vs Olympus VG-160 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix A900 | Olympus VG-160 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model | Nikon Coolpix A900 | Olympus VG-160 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2016-02-23 | 2012-01-10 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-840mm (35.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.4-6.9 | f/2.8-6.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 7cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 921 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 7.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) | 4.80 m |
| Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p, 25p) | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 289 gr (0.64 lbs) | 125 gr (0.28 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 113 x 67 x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 shots | 165 shots |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | EN-EL12 | LI-70B |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 5, 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $400 | $90 |