Nikon AW110 vs Samsung EX2F
92 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39
90 Imaging
36 Features
62 Overall
46
Nikon AW110 vs Samsung EX2F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-4.8) lens
- 193g - 110 x 65 x 25mm
- Released July 2013
- Replaced the Nikon AW100
- Replacement is Nikon AW120
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-80mm (F1.4-2.7) lens
- 294g - 112 x 62 x 29mm
- Revealed December 2012
Photography Glossary Nikon AW110 vs Samsung EX2F: A Deep Dive into Compact Camera Capabilities and Real-World Performance
Choosing between cameras such as the Nikon Coolpix AW110 and the Samsung EX2F is not straightforward. Both compact models arrived in the mid-2010s with distinct target users and feature sets, making them intriguing choices for enthusiasts who want portability combined with solid imaging capabilities. Over years of hands-on testing and field use spanning journalism, travel, and casual wildlife photography, I’ve developed an appreciation for subtle trade-offs these cameras embody.
Today, I’ll break down these two contenders across all key photography disciplines - portrait, landscape, wildlife, sports, street, macro, low-light, video, travel, and professional usability - grounded in technical data, real-world practice, and my in-field impressions. Rather than just specs, I aim to provide practical insight that helps photographers match these cameras to their needs and budgets.
Compact Body and Handling: Ruggedness vs. Ergonomics
First impressions often come down to size, build quality, and ergonomics. The Nikon AW110 is designed foremost as a rugged waterproof compact, tailored for adventurous environments. The Samsung EX2F, meanwhile, is a premium small sensor compact focused on image quality and manual control.

Physically, the AW110 measures 110 x 65 x 25 mm and weighs just 193 g, making it lighter and smaller than the 112 x 62 x 29 mm, 294 g Samsung. The Nikon’s build is specifically engineered for waterproofing to 18m, shockproofing from 2m drops, dustproof and freezeproof capabilities. That means you can rely on it at the beach, on hiking trails, or near water - something the EX2F cannot do.
Ergonomically, the Samsung's body offers a more substantial grip area and refined dial-based controls, while the AW110 opts for a simple compact shell without extensive mechanical dials or manual controls. This translates to the AW110 feeling more pocketable and lighter for on-the-go adventure but the EX2F offering better grip during longer shoots or when using manual features.
Next, let’s look at control layouts and user interface, since handling extends beyond raw size.

The EX2F sports dedicated physical dials for aperture and shutter priority modes, plus a built-in electronic viewfinder as an optional accessory. These professional touches make it far more controllable in bright light or while manually adjusting exposure. The AW110, helmed by a fixed lens and no electronic viewfinder, uses a touchscreen OLED fixed monitor with limited direct controls - sufficient for casual users but less so for professionals who prefer tactile feedback.
Sensor Specifications and Image Quality: Bigger is Sometimes Better
Sensor size and quality are foundational to image performance. The AW110 uses a standard 1/2.3” CMOS sensor with 16 megapixels, while the EX2F incorporates a larger 1/1.7” BSI-CMOS 12-megapixel sensor.

What does this mean practically? The Samsung’s larger sensor area (41.52 mm² vs 28.07 mm²) combined with backside illumination technology yields better dynamic range, low-light sensitivity, and color depth. DxOMark’s partial metrics for the EX2F confirm it scores respectably in color depth (20 bits) and dynamic range (11.5 EV), with a low light ISO score indicating usable images even at higher ISOs. The AW110 lacks formal DxOMark testing but typical 1/2.3” sensors in this class perform moderately behind the EX2F, with restricted dynamic range and noisier high ISO results.
Color reproduction on the EX2F is noticeably richer and more natural under various lighting, while the AW110 colors appear slightly subdued or cooler, which some might appreciate for underwater photography. Detail preservation is higher on the Samsung, but the AW110’s 16MP resolution is helpful for cropping or printing moderate sizes.
Ultimately, official scores aside, sensor technology and size advantage help the EX2F achieve superior overall image quality, while the AW110 balances acceptable quality with rugged utility.
Screen and Viewfinder Experience: Brightness, Articulation, and Framing
Both cameras offer 3-inch screens, but with different tech and implementations.

The AW110’s OLED screen provides vibrant colors and good viewing angles but remains fixed without articulation. It also has fairly low resolution at 614k dots, which can be limiting for focus confirmation or reviewing images in detail. The lack of touchscreen additionally means navigation and settings rely on physical buttons, occasionally leading to less intuitive operation in fast shooting situations.
The Samsung EX2F shines in this department with its fully articulated AMOLED 3-inch screen. The flexibility to tilt and angle the display is invaluable for shooting at odd perspectives or capturing self-portraits (indeed, it is selfie-friendly per specs). The AMOLED technology produces bright, punchy images with deep blacks, assisting composition in daylight. It sadly lacks touch control, which is a minor disappointment given the overall advanced design.
The AW110’s absence of a viewfinder (optical or electronic) means framing must always be done on the LCD, which can be challenging in bright outdoor environments. The EX2F offers an optional electronic viewfinder accessory that adds versatility for those who prefer eye-level compositions - a feature appealing to enthusiasts used to more traditional camera handling.
Autofocus Performance: Speed, Accuracy, and Tracking
Autofocus is critical for capturing moments whether portraits, wildlife, or fast sports action.
The AW110 employs contrast-detection autofocus with 9 focus points and centers around face detection (no eye detection), coupled with an AF tracking mode that attempts to follow moving subjects. The minimum macro focus distance of 1 cm is impressive for close-ups.
The EX2F uses contrast detection as well but lacks face or eye detection and offers simpler AF point setups. It does, however, support manual focus with focus peaking - a boon for macro or low-light work where autofocus may struggle.
In practice, the Nikon AW110 autofocus performs well in bright daylight and offers decent tracking for slower-moving subjects, thanks in part to its rugged action-oriented design. However, in dimmer indoor or shadow situations, focus hunting can occur, limiting reliability for critical or fast sports shoots.
The Samsung EX2F autofocus works swiftly with good accuracy in well-lit situations but can lag compared to modern hybrid AF systems. Its manual focus capabilities help mitigate this for macro or controlled portraiture but tracking fast action, such as wildlife or sports, is less robust.
Lens Range and Aperture: Versatility vs. Speed
Optically, the AW110 offers a 28-140 mm equivalent zoom with a maximum aperture of f/3.9-4.8 - relatively modest and typical of rugged compacts prioritizing size and protection.
The EX2F features a premium 24-80 mm equivalent lens with an astonishing wide aperture range of f/1.4-2.7, making it one of the fastest compact zooms available in this era.
This bright lens advantage translates to superior low-light performance and creamy background blur (bokeh), especially at wide angle and standard focal lengths - critical benefits for portrait photography.
The Nikon’s more extended zoom provides more telephoto reach, advantageous for wildlife or travel scenarios where a versatile zoom is prized. However, its slower aperture limits shallow depth of field and may require higher ISOs indoors or at dusk.
Flash and Lighting: On-Board and External Options
Built-in flash modes differ notably. The AW110 offers basic flash functionality with a 5.2 m range and limited control modes. External flash use is not supported, reflecting its point-and-shoot rugged character.
The Samsung EX2F includes a more sophisticated built-in flash featuring multiple modes (red-eye reduction, slow sync, fill-in, manual), plus supports external flash units via a hot shoe - a significant plus for creative lighting and studio shoots.
For portraits and controlled lighting, the EX2F clearly leads, providing flexibility to shape light for flattering skin tones and mood, while the AW110 is adequate mainly for fill-in or snapshot scenarios.
Connectivity, Storage, and Battery Life
Both cameras use standard SD/SDHC/SDXC memory cards with a single slot. Battery life varies, with the AW110 able to deliver approximately 250 shots per charge (using the EN-EL12 battery), while Samsung doesn’t officially specify battery life but anecdotal reports suggest lower endurance due to AMOLED screen and advanced processing.
Connectivity includes built-in wireless for both, but features like Bluetooth, NFC, or HDMI outputs differ.
The AW110 lacks HDMI and external microphone ports but integrates GPS, a boon for geotagging adventure photos.
The EX2F offers HDMI output and external flash connectivity but no GPS. Its USB 2.0 port is standard for image transfers on both cameras.
Let’s Talk Genres: Performance Across Photography Styles
Now we dive into how these two cameras stack up in real shooting disciplines, blending specs with tested results and usage notes.
Portrait Photography
Portraits demand pleasing skin tones, accurate color, eye detection, and bokeh capability.
The AW110’s face detection helps frame faces, but limited control over depth of field and slower lens limits artistic background blur. Skin tone rendition is serviceable but occasionally shifts cooler underwater or harsh sunlight.
The EX2F shines with its fast f/1.4 aperture enabling smooth bokeh rendering, manual exposure modes for precise color balance, and manual focus peaking aiding sharp eye capture when autofocus misses.
For portrait shooters prioritizing image quality and creativity, the Samsung is the clear choice.
Landscape Photography
Dynamic range, sensor resolution, and weather sealing matter most in landscapes.
The EX2F’s larger sensor and superior DR let it preserve details in highlights and shadows better. Its smaller zoom range is less critical here since landscapes often prefer wide angles.
The Nikon’s rugged environmental sealing makes it preferable for harsh outdoor use – splash, dust, and freeze resistance enable shooting in tough conditions inaccessible to the Samsung.
If the landscape involves extreme terrain and weather, the AW110’s durability makes it a winner, otherwise, the EX2F's superior image quality will appeal.
Wildlife Photography
Wildlife demands telephoto reach, autofocus speed/tracking, and burst rates.
The AW110 offers a longer zoom to 140 mm equivalent, shuffle-proof focus tracking, and 8 fps burst mode, advantageous for quick wildlife snaps.
The EX2F’s shorter zoom and lack of tracking autofocus hinder fast-moving animal shots, despite superior image quality.
For casual wildlife photographers wanting a rugged camera, AW110 excels; serious wildlife enthusiasts might look elsewhere, but if precise image quality trumps versatility, EX2F suffices.
Sports Photography
Sports require fast continuous shooting, accurate autofocus tracking, and low-light capability.
The AW110’s 8 fps burst is useful, but its limited AF modes and contrast detection AF slow down accurate tracking under dynamic conditions.
The EX2F lacks specified burst rates but its advanced manual controls and fast lens support better exposures in difficult lighting, though autofocus is not ideally tailored to sports.
Neither camera is ideal for professional sports shooters, but AW110 slightly edges for amateur use thanks to faster burst.
Street Photography
Street shooting demands compactness, discretion, low-light prowess, and quick operation.
AW110’s smaller body, lightweight, and waterproofing offer stealth and reliability, especially around urban water features or festivals.
Samsung EX2F’s articulating screen and wide aperture allow creative angles and superior images in dim cafes.
Both are portable but the AW110 wins on ruggedness and pocketability; EX2F for image quality and creative control.
Macro Photography
Precise focusing, magnification, and stabilization are crucial here.
AW110’s close focus at 1 cm and optical image stabilization favor detailed, sharp close-ups.
EX2F supports manual focus with peaking, an advantage in challenging macro light, but lacks macro specs.
For macro enthusiasts, the AW110’s dedicated macro range and steadying features offer a slight advantage.
Night / Astrophotography
High ISO performance and special exposure modes aid night scenes.
EX2F’s larger sensor, higher max ISO (3200), and wide aperture let it outperform the AW110’s maximum ISO of 1600 and slower lens by a noticeable margin under low light.
Neither offers long exposure night modes, limiting astrophotography, but EX2F’s cleaner high ISO images prevail.
Video Capabilities
Both support Full HD 1920x1080 video but differ in formats and stabilization.
AW110 outputs MPEG-4 and H.264 with optical image stabilization, suitable for action shots in rugged environments.
EX2F records H.264 but lacks onboard stabilization mention; its articulating screen aids video framing.
Neither has microphone or headphone jacks - limiting professional audio capture.
For casual HD video in challenging conditions, AW110 is preferable.
Travel Photography
Travel photographers want versatility, battery life, compactness, and reliability.
AW110’s rugged size, GPS tagging, and battery longevity excel for outdoor exploratory travel.
EX2F’s higher image quality, better controls, and articulated screen provide creative tools but weigh more and lack waterproof ability.
Travelers focused on landscapes and versatility may pick the Nikon; those wanting refined artistic control might prefer the Samsung’s optical advantages.
Professional Work
Workflow integration, RAW support, and reliability are key.
EX2F supports RAW capture enabling post-processing flexibility; AW110 does not.
Samsung’s manual modes allow precise exposure control required for professional assignments, but it lacks weather sealing.
Nikon’s rugged reliability and GPS assist fieldwork but limited control and no RAW are drawbacks for professional image quality.
Summary of Technical Performance and Ratings
The Samsung EX2F takes the lead overall in image quality, color depth, dynamic range, and manual control capabilities thanks to its bigger sensor and fast lens.
The Nikon AW110 shines in durability, telephoto reach, burst shooting, and rugged utility, though it compromises slightly on image finesse and control.
As the graphic illustrates, the EX2F dominates portrait, night, and landscape usability with superior sensor performance. The AW110 excels in wildlife, sports burst, and travel robustness.
Real-World Sample Gallery
Inspecting these real field images, you can discern the sharper detail and richer color rendition from the EX2F, alongside smoother bokeh. The AW110’s images show slightly more noise and muted color but good action freeze and reasonable sharpness under bright conditions.
Final Verdict: Which Should You Choose?
The Nikon AW110 is a compelling compact for adventurers, casual wildlife photographers, and travelers who require a tough, pocketable camera ready to survive water, dust, and drops without fuss. Its longer zoom reach and solid burst rate provide versatility. However, it lacks RAW, advanced manual controls, and falls short on dynamic range and color fidelity.
The Samsung EX2F targets enthusiasts and semi-professionals seeking a smaller sensor compact with excellent image quality, manual exposure modes, a fast lens, and RAW shooting for creative latitude, especially in studio, travel, and portrait genres. Its downsides are heavier weight, no environmental sealing, and a shorter zoom range.
Recommendations:
- For explorers, outdoor enthusiasts, and adventure photographers: Nikon AW110 is the insurance policy against tough environments.
- For portrait, landscape, and creative shooters wanting image quality and manual control: Samsung EX2F is the better pick.
- Budget-conscious buyers looking for ruggedness on a modest budget: AW110 at approximately $250 is attractive.
- Those willing to invest more (~$480) for superior optics and files: EX2F justifies the premium.
Closing Thoughts
Years of experience testing cameras reveal that no compact camera perfectly solves every problem; it’s about a compromise based on priorities. The Nikon Coolpix AW110 and Samsung EX2F represent two distinct philosophies: rugged utility versus optical refinement. Understanding their strengths and limitations lets photographers make smarter choices aligned with their shooting style and environment.
For those valuing adventure-ready toughness with solid image performance, the AW110 remains a trusty companion. For anyone seeking the best image quality and manual flexibility in a compact form factor, the EX2F’s bright lens and sensor优势shine clearly.
Hopefully, this comparison arms you with the insights needed to decide which camera is your next trusty partner behind the lens.
Happy shooting!
Nikon AW110 vs Samsung EX2F Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix AW110 | Samsung EX2F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Nikon | Samsung |
| Model | Nikon Coolpix AW110 | Samsung EX2F |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2013-07-05 | 2012-12-18 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-80mm (3.3x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.9-4.8 | f/1.4-2.7 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 614k dots | 0k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen tech | OLED monitor | AMOLED |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | - |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1500 secs | - |
| Continuous shutter rate | 8.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.20 m | - |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1920 x 1080 |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 193g (0.43 lbs) | 294g (0.65 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 110 x 65 x 25mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 112 x 62 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | 48 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 20.0 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.5 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 209 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 250 images | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | EN-EL12 | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | - | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD / SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $250 | $478 |