Nikon L22 vs Olympus 8010
93 Imaging
35 Features
14 Overall
26
92 Imaging
36 Features
29 Overall
33
Nikon L22 vs Olympus 8010 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 37-134mm (F3.1-6.7) lens
- 183g - 98 x 61 x 28mm
- Announced February 2010
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 245g - 98 x 64 x 24mm
- Introduced February 2010
- Other Name is mju Tough 8010
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Nikon L22 vs Olympus 8010 Overview
Following is a comprehensive analysis of the Nikon L22 versus Olympus 8010, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers Nikon and Olympus. The image resolution of the L22 (12MP) and the 8010 (13MP) is relatively comparable and they use the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe L22 was brought out within a month of the 8010 which means that they are of a similar age. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving straight into a in depth comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the L22 scores vs the 8010 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Nikon L22 vs Olympus 8010 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Nikon Coolpix L22 & Olympus Stylus Tough 8010. The entire galleries are viewable at Nikon L22 Gallery & Olympus 8010 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon L22 over the Olympus 8010
| L22 | 8010 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Olympus 8010 over the Nikon L22
| 8010 | L22 |
|---|
Common features in the Nikon L22 and Olympus 8010
| L22 | 8010 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2010 |  | February 2010 | Same age |
| Manually focus |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither has Touch friendly screen |
Nikon L22 vs Olympus 8010 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry around your camera, you will have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Nikon L22 has physical dimensions of 98mm x 61mm x 28mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 183 grams (0.40 lbs) and the Olympus 8010 has proportions of 98mm x 64mm x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Compare the Nikon L22 versus Olympus 8010 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilising during that time. Below is the front view dimensions comparison of the L22 vs the 8010.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the L22 and 8010 is 93 and 92 respectively.
Nikon L22 vs Olympus 8010 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its difficult to visualize the difference in sensor sizes just by checking out specs. The pic underneath might give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the L22 and 8010.
All in all, the two cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit different resolution. You can count on the Olympus 8010 to provide more detail having its extra 1 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop pictures far more aggressively.
Nikon L22 vs Olympus 8010 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Nikon L22 vs Olympus 8010 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix L22 | Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model type | Nikon Coolpix L22 | Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 |
| Otherwise known as | - | mju Tough 8010 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2010-02-03 | 2010-02-02 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Expeed C2 | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 13 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 64 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 37-134mm (3.6x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.1-6.7 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8 seconds | 1/4 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 5.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 4.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow Syncro | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 183g (0.40 lb) | 245g (0.54 lb) |
| Dimensions | 98 x 61 x 28mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 98 x 64 x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | 2 x AA | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $130 | $600 |
