Nikon P300 vs Olympus VR-340
92 Imaging
35 Features
44 Overall
38
96 Imaging
38 Features
36 Overall
37
Nikon P300 vs Olympus VR-340 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 160 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-100mm (F1.8-4.9) lens
- 189g - 103 x 58 x 32mm
- Released May 2011
- Successor is Nikon P310
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.0-5.7) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Launched January 2012
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Nikon P300 vs Olympus VR-340 Overview
Its time to look much closer at the Nikon P300 vs Olympus VR-340, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by rivals Nikon and Olympus. There is a large difference among the sensor resolutions of the P300 (12MP) and VR-340 (16MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe P300 was revealed 7 months earlier than the VR-340 and they are of a similar age. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a short summary of how the P300 matches up versus the VR-340 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Nikon P300 vs Olympus VR-340 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Nikon Coolpix P300 & Olympus VR-340. The full galleries are available at Nikon P300 Gallery & Olympus VR-340 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon P300 over the Olympus VR-340
| P300 | VR-340 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 922k | 460k | Crisper display (+462k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-340 over the Nikon P300
| VR-340 | P300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2012 | May 2011 | Newer by 7 months |
Common features in the Nikon P300 and Olympus VR-340
| P300 | VR-340 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Lack of manual focus | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display sizing | |
| Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Neither comes with Touch display |
Nikon P300 vs Olympus VR-340 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to travel with your camera, you have to think about its weight and volume. The Nikon P300 comes with exterior dimensions of 103mm x 58mm x 32mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") and a weight of 189 grams (0.42 lbs) whilst the Olympus VR-340 has sizing of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).
Analyze the Nikon P300 vs Olympus VR-340 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are working with at that time. Underneath is a front view measurement comparison of the P300 compared to the VR-340.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the P300 and VR-340 is 92 and 96 respectively.
Nikon P300 vs Olympus VR-340 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its difficult to imagine the gap in sensor dimensions purely by checking out technical specs. The picture here should give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the P300 and VR-340.
As you can tell, both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different resolution. You can expect to see the Olympus VR-340 to provide extra detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop images more aggressively. The more aged P300 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Nikon P300 vs Olympus VR-340 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Nikon P300 vs Olympus VR-340 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix P300 | Olympus VR-340 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model type | Nikon Coolpix P300 | Olympus VR-340 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2011-05-31 | 2012-01-10 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Expeed C2 | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 160 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-100mm (4.2x) | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/1.8-4.9 | f/3.0-5.7 |
| Macro focusing range | 3cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 922k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display technology | TFT-LCD with anti-reflection coating | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 7.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 6.50 m | 4.80 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (15, 30fps), 1280 x 720p (15, 30, 60 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 189g (0.42 lbs) | 125g (0.28 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 103 x 58 x 32mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 photographs | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | EN-EL12 | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (10 or 2 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at launch | $500 | $130 |