Nikon P950 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill
52 Imaging
43 Features
70 Overall
53
83 Imaging
56 Features
33 Overall
46
Nikon P950 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.2" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-2000mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 1005g - 140 x 110 x 150mm
- Announced January 2020
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 640 x 480 video
- 50mm (F2.8) lens
- 330g - 122 x 67 x 59mm
- Launched February 2012
- Succeeded the Sigma DP1 Merrill
- Renewed by Sigma DP3 Merrill
Nikon P950 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Overview
Here, we will be looking at the Nikon P950 and Sigma DP2 Merrill, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by brands Nikon and Sigma. The image resolution of the P950 (16MP) and the DP2 Merrill (15MP) is pretty well matched but the P950 (1/2.3") and DP2 Merrill (APS-C) posses totally different sensor measurements.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe P950 was launched 8 years later than the DP2 Merrill and that is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Nikon P950 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Sigma DP2 Merrill being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before going into a in depth comparison, here is a brief view of how the P950 grades against the DP2 Merrill in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Nikon P950 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Nikon Coolpix P950 and Sigma DP2 Merrill. The complete galleries are viewable at Nikon P950 Gallery and Sigma DP2 Merrill Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon P950 over the Sigma DP2 Merrill
P950 | DP2 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2020 | February 2012 | More recent by 97 months | |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen size | 3.2" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.2") | |
Screen resolution | 921k | 920k | Crisper screen (+1k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Merrill over the Nikon P950
DP2 Merrill | P950 |
---|
Common features in the Nikon P950 and Sigma DP2 Merrill
P950 | DP2 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial precise focusing | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither has Touch friendly screen |
Nikon P950 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Physical Comparison
When you are going to lug around your camera regularly, you have to think about its weight and size. The Nikon P950 has external dimensions of 140mm x 110mm x 150mm (5.5" x 4.3" x 5.9") with a weight of 1005 grams (2.22 lbs) while the Sigma DP2 Merrill has specifications of 122mm x 67mm x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3") having a weight of 330 grams (0.73 lbs).
Examine the Nikon P950 and Sigma DP2 Merrill in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are using during that time. Underneath is a front view dimensions comparison of the P950 and the DP2 Merrill.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the P950 and DP2 Merrill is 52 and 83 respectively.
Nikon P950 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's hard to envision the difference between sensor measurements just by reading through a spec sheet. The visual here should provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the P950 and DP2 Merrill.
Clearly, both of these cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The P950 because of its tinier sensor will make getting shallow depth of field more difficult and the Nikon P950 will give more detail utilizing its extra 1 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The more modern P950 will have an edge in sensor tech.
Nikon P950 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Nikon P950 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Specifications
Nikon Coolpix P950 | Sigma DP2 Merrill | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Nikon | Sigma |
Model | Nikon Coolpix P950 | Sigma DP2 Merrill |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2020-01-07 | 2012-02-08 |
Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Dual TRUE II engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 24 x 16mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 384.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 15MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4704 x 3136 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-2000mm (83.3x) | 50mm (1x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/2.8 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3.2 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 921k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,359k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 90 percent | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 300 seconds | - |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 7.0 frames per sec | 4.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 11.50 m (at Auto ISO) | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | - | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 25p, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MP4, H.264, AAC | 640x480 |
Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 640x480 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | EN-EL20a lithium-ion battery & USB charger | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 1005 gr (2.22 lbs) | 330 gr (0.73 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 140 x 110 x 150mm (5.5" x 4.3" x 5.9") | 122 x 67 x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 290 images | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Self timer | Yes | - |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch price | $797 | $931 |