Clicky

Nikon S220 vs Samsung WB150F

Portability
97
Imaging
33
Features
11
Overall
24
Nikon Coolpix S220 front
 
Samsung WB150F front
Portability
93
Imaging
38
Features
42
Overall
39

Nikon S220 vs Samsung WB150F Key Specs

Nikon S220
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 2000
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 35-105mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
  • 100g - 90 x 56 x 18mm
  • Announced February 2009
Samsung WB150F
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
  • 188g - 107 x 61 x 23mm
  • Revealed January 2012
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Nikon S220 vs Samsung WB150F Overview

Below is a complete review of the Nikon S220 vs Samsung WB150F, one being a Ultracompact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Nikon and Samsung. There exists a crucial gap between the sensor resolutions of the S220 (10MP) and WB150F (14MP) but both cameras offer the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The S220 was released 3 years before the WB150F and that is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Nikon S220 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung WB150F being a Compact camera.

Before getting straight to a in depth comparison, here is a concise overview of how the S220 scores vs the WB150F with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Nikon S220 over the Samsung WB150F

 S220 WB150F 

Reasons to pick Samsung WB150F over the Nikon S220

 WB150F S220 
RevealedJanuary 2012February 2009More recent by 35 months
Focus manually Very precise focusing
Screen dimensions3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution460k230kSharper screen (+230k dot)

Common features in the Nikon S220 and Samsung WB150F

 S220 WB150F 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen
Touch screen Lack of Touch screen

Nikon S220 vs Samsung WB150F Physical Comparison

In case you're planning to lug around your camera, you have to think about its weight and measurements. The Nikon S220 comes with outer dimensions of 90mm x 56mm x 18mm (3.5" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of 100 grams (0.22 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB150F has proportions of 107mm x 61mm x 23mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 188 grams (0.41 lbs).

Check out the Nikon S220 vs Samsung WB150F in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have at that time. Underneath is a front view measurements comparison of the S220 vs the WB150F.

Nikon S220 vs Samsung WB150F size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the S220 and WB150F is 97 and 93 respectively.

Nikon S220 vs Samsung WB150F top view buttons comparison

Nikon S220 vs Samsung WB150F Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it is very difficult to visualize the gap between sensor measurements purely by going over technical specs. The visual here may provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the S220 and WB150F.

As you have seen, both of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different megapixels. You should expect the Samsung WB150F to offer you greater detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The older S220 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.

Nikon S220 vs Samsung WB150F sensor size comparison

Nikon S220 vs Samsung WB150F Screen and ViewFinder

Nikon S220 vs Samsung WB150F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Nikon S220
Portrait photography with Samsung WB150F
19
focusing manually not possible
manual exposure not possible
can't use external flash
low megapixels (10MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW files
42
focusing manually
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
provides face detect focus
can't use external flash
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Nikon S220 Street photography info
Samsung WB150F Street photography info
48
no moving screen
no image stabilization
very small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW files
62
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than average in class (188g)
no moving screen
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Sports Comparison

Nikon S220 Sports photography highlights
Samsung WB150F Sports photography highlights
16
no shutter priority
no image stabilization
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
52
long zoom range (24-432mm 18.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
provides tracking focus
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Nikon S220 Travel photography factors
Samsung WB150F Travel photography factors
52
built-in flash
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
low megapixels (10MP)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
wide angle not fantastic (35mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.1)
69
lighter than average in class (188 grams)
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
pretty wide (24mm)
great zoom (432mm)
does not have Time Lapse mode
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.2)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Nikon S220 as a Landscape photography camera
Samsung WB150F as a Landscape photography camera
22
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not fantastic (35mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.1)
screen is somewhat small (2.5 inch)
manual exposure not possible
no image stabilization
low megapixels (10MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW files
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
49
focusing manually
pretty wide (24mm)
screen is a decent size (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.2)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
does not have Time Lapse mode
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Nikon S220 Vlogging advice
Samsung WB150F Vlogging advice
22
wide angle not fantastic (35mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.1)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
no image stabilization
video quality not great (640 x 480 pixels)
doesn't have external mic support
32
pretty wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
provides face detect focus
lighter than average in class (188g)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.2)
screen isn't selfie friendly
video res low (1280 x 720 pxls)
does not have mic support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Nikon S220 vs Samsung WB150F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Nikon S220 and Samsung WB150F
 Nikon Coolpix S220Samsung WB150F
General Information
Brand Nikon Samsung
Model Nikon Coolpix S220 Samsung WB150F
Class Ultracompact Small Sensor Superzoom
Announced 2009-02-03 2012-01-09
Physical type Ultracompact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.08 x 4.56mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 27.7mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 3648 x 2736 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 2000 3200
Minimum native ISO 80 80
RAW data
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 35-105mm (3.0x) 24-432mm (18.0x)
Largest aperture f/3.1-5.9 f/3.2-5.8
Macro focus range 10cm 5cm
Focal length multiplier 5.9 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 2.5 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 230k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Screen technology - TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 8 seconds 16 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shooting rate 11.0fps 10.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range - 3.50 m
Flash options Auto, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On, Slow sync Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Maximum video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video file format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 100g (0.22 lbs) 188g (0.41 lbs)
Physical dimensions 90 x 56 x 18mm (3.5" x 2.2" x 0.7") 107 x 61 x 23mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model EN-EL10 SLB-10A
Self timer Yes (3 or 10 sec) Yes
Time lapse shooting
Storage type SD/SDHC, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots Single Single
Launch cost $56 $230