Nikon S5300 vs Olympus VR-330
95 Imaging
40 Features
40 Overall
40
94 Imaging
36 Features
38 Overall
36
Nikon S5300 vs Olympus VR-330 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-208mm (F3.7-6.6) lens
- 138g - 97 x 58 x 21mm
- Launched January 2014
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Announced February 2011
- Old Model is Olympus VR-320
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Nikon S5300 vs Olympus VR-330 Overview
In this article, we will be contrasting the Nikon S5300 versus Olympus VR-330, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Nikon and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the S5300 (16MP) and the VR-330 (14MP) is pretty close and they feature the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe S5300 was brought out 2 years after the VR-330 which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving in to a thorough comparison, below is a simple overview of how the S5300 scores versus the VR-330 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Nikon S5300 vs Olympus VR-330 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Nikon Coolpix S5300 and Olympus VR-330. The entire galleries are available at Nikon S5300 Gallery and Olympus VR-330 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S5300 over the Olympus VR-330
| S5300 | VR-330 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2014 | February 2011 | More modern by 36 months | |
| Focus manually | Very precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the Nikon S5300
| VR-330 | S5300 |
|---|
Common features in the Nikon S5300 and Olympus VR-330
| S5300 | VR-330 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen measurements | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 460k | Same screen resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Lacking Touch screen |
Nikon S5300 vs Olympus VR-330 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry around your camera often, you'll need to factor in its weight and size. The Nikon S5300 enjoys exterior dimensions of 97mm x 58mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 138 grams (0.30 lbs) and the Olympus VR-330 has specifications of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Compare the Nikon S5300 versus Olympus VR-330 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you use during that time. Here is the front view dimension comparison of the S5300 and the VR-330.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the S5300 and VR-330 is 95 and 94 respectively.
Nikon S5300 vs Olympus VR-330 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is difficult to visualise the contrast in sensor sizes simply by researching technical specs. The picture underneath will offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the S5300 and VR-330.
As you have seen, both of the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same resolution. You should expect the Nikon S5300 to result in extra detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop photographs a little more aggressively. The more modern S5300 will have a benefit in sensor innovation.
Nikon S5300 vs Olympus VR-330 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Nikon S5300 vs Olympus VR-330 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S5300 | Olympus VR-330 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model | Nikon Coolpix S5300 | Olympus VR-330 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2014-01-07 | 2011-02-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 99 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-208mm (8.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.7-6.6 | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 460 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display tech | TFT-LCD | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1500 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 7.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.50 m | 4.70 m |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720 (30fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 138g (0.30 lbs) | 158g (0.35 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 97 x 58 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.8") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 180 photos | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | EN-EL19 | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (10 or 2 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $180 | $220 |