Nikon S9300 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ
Portability
91 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
91 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
Portability
78 Imaging
37 Features
34 Overall
35
78 Imaging
37 Features
34 Overall
35
Nikon S9300 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ Key Specs
Nikon S9300
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 215g - 109 x 62 x 31mm
- Introduced July 2012
- Old Model is Nikon S9100
- Updated by Nikon S9500
Olympus SP-810 UZ
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-864mm (F2.9-5.7) lens
- 413g - 106 x 76 x 74mm
- Introduced July 2011
- Previous Model is Olympus SP-800 UZ
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Nikon S9300 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ Overview
Below, we will be looking at the Nikon S9300 versus Olympus SP-810 UZ, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by competitors Nikon and Olympus. The resolution of the S9300 (16MP) and the SP-810 UZ (14MP) is relatively close and they possess the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe S9300 was announced 12 months after the SP-810 UZ so they are of a similar age. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Nikon S9300 being a Compact camera and the Olympus SP-810 UZ being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before going in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a short summation of how the S9300 grades versus the SP-810 UZ for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Nikon S9300 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Nikon Coolpix S9300 & Olympus SP-810 UZ. The whole galleries are viewable at Nikon S9300 Gallery & Olympus SP-810 UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S9300 over the Olympus SP-810 UZ
| S9300 | SP-810 UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | July 2012 |  | July 2011 | Newer by 12 months |
| Screen resolution | 921k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+691k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-810 UZ over the Nikon S9300
| SP-810 UZ | S9300 |
|---|
Common features in the Nikon S9300 and Olympus SP-810 UZ
| S9300 | SP-810 UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | No Touch screen |
Nikon S9300 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you will need to factor in its weight and size. The Nikon S9300 offers outside dimensions of 109mm x 62mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 215 grams (0.47 lbs) while the Olympus SP-810 UZ has specifications of 106mm x 76mm x 74mm (4.2" x 3.0" x 2.9") with a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs).
Analyze the Nikon S9300 versus Olympus SP-810 UZ in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Below is the front view overall size comparison of the S9300 and the SP-810 UZ.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the S9300 and SP-810 UZ is 91 and 78 respectively.
Nikon S9300 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very hard to visualize the gap in sensor dimensions purely by looking through specifications. The pic below will help offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the S9300 and SP-810 UZ.
Plainly, each of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit different resolution. You can count on the Nikon S9300 to render extra detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The more recent S9300 provides a benefit in sensor technology.
Nikon S9300 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Nikon S9300 Portrait photography highlights
Olympus SP-810 UZ Portrait photography highlights
MP count good (16MP)
comes with face detection autofocus
no manual focus
no manual mode
cannot use external flash
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
includes face detection focusing
lack of manual focus
manual exposure not available
no external flash support
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Nikon S9300 Street photography factors
Olympus SP-810 UZ Street photography factors
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competitors in class (215 grams)
screen does not articulate
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
fixed screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Nikon S9300 Sports photography advice
Olympus SP-810 UZ Sports photography advice
great zoom range (25-450mm 18.0 x zoom)
max shutter speed is good (1/8,000 seconds)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
MP count good (16MP)
comes with tracking autofocus
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
bad battery power (200 shots)
does not have phase detect autofocus
long zoom range (24-864mm 36.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
includes tracking autofocus
maximum shutter speed is a little low (1/1,200s)
painfully slow continuous shooting (0.7 frames per second)
no shutter priority
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no phase detect AF
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Nikon S9300 as a Travel photography camera
Olympus SP-810 UZ as a Travel photography camera
lighter than competitors in class (215g)
MP count good (16MP)
has built in flash
quite wide (25mm)
great reach (450mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
bad battery power (200 per charge)
display is not selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f3.5)
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
reasonably wide (24mm)
very long zoom (864mm)
doesn't have Timelapse function
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.9)
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Nikon S9300 Landscape photography info
Olympus SP-810 UZ Landscape photography info
quite wide (25mm)
screen size is good (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
MP count good (16 megapixels)
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
no manual mode
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
bad battery power (200 CIPA)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
reasonably wide (24mm)
nice screen size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.9)
manual exposure not available
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
doesn't have Timelapse function
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Nikon S9300 Vlogging advice
Olympus SP-810 UZ Vlogging advice
quite wide (25mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
comes with face detection autofocus
video res high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than competitors in class (215g)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
display is not selfie friendly
doesn't have external mic port
reasonably wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes face detection focusing
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.9)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pxls)
doesn't have external microphone support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Nikon S9300 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S9300 | Olympus SP-810 UZ | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model | Nikon Coolpix S9300 | Olympus SP-810 UZ |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2012-07-16 | 2011-07-27 |
| Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 24-864mm (36.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/2.9-5.7 |
| Macro focus distance | 4cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 921 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen tech | TFT-LCD with Anti-reflection coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 1/4 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/1200 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 6.9 frames/s | 0.7 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 6.20 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow-sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720p (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 215 grams (0.47 pounds) | 413 grams (0.91 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 109 x 62 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 106 x 76 x 74mm (4.2" x 3.0" x 2.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 200 pictures | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | EN-EL12 | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (12 or 2 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $249 | $280 |