Nikon S9300 vs Panasonic FZ2500
91 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
53 Imaging
53 Features
81 Overall
64
Nikon S9300 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 215g - 109 x 62 x 31mm
- Introduced July 2012
- Old Model is Nikon S9100
- Updated by Nikon S9500
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Increase to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 4096 x 2160 video
- 24-480mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 915g - 138 x 102 x 135mm
- Announced September 2016
- Additionally Known as Lumix DMC-FZ2000
- Earlier Model is Panasonic FZ1000
Nikon S9300 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Overview
Let's look a bit more in depth at the Nikon S9300 vs Panasonic FZ2500, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Large Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Nikon and Panasonic. The image resolution of the S9300 (16MP) and the FZ2500 (20MP) is pretty comparable but the S9300 (1/2.3") and FZ2500 (1") come with different sensor measurements.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe S9300 was unveiled 5 years earlier than the FZ2500 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Nikon S9300 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FZ2500 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before going through a full comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the S9300 grades versus the FZ2500 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Nikon S9300 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Nikon Coolpix S9300 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500. The full galleries are viewable at Nikon S9300 Gallery & Panasonic FZ2500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S9300 over the Panasonic FZ2500
S9300 | FZ2500 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ2500 over the Nikon S9300
FZ2500 | S9300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2016 | July 2012 | More recent by 50 months | |
Manually focus | Dial accurate focus | |||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen resolution | 1040k | 921k | Clearer screen (+119k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Nikon S9300 and Panasonic FZ2500
S9300 | FZ2500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen measurements |
Nikon S9300 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you should factor in its weight and volume. The Nikon S9300 features outside dimensions of 109mm x 62mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 215 grams (0.47 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FZ2500 has sizing of 138mm x 102mm x 135mm (5.4" x 4.0" x 5.3") and a weight of 915 grams (2.02 lbs).
Check out the Nikon S9300 vs Panasonic FZ2500 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have attached at the time. Here is the front view sizing comparison of the S9300 compared to the FZ2500.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the S9300 and FZ2500 is 91 and 53 respectively.
Nikon S9300 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor measurements simply by seeing a spec sheet. The graphic underneath might give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the S9300 and FZ2500.
Clearly, each of these cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The S9300 having a smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field tougher and the Panasonic FZ2500 will provide extra detail having an extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop photographs a little more aggressively. The older S9300 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Nikon S9300 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Nikon S9300 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Specifications
Nikon Coolpix S9300 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Nikon | Panasonic |
Model | Nikon Coolpix S9300 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 |
Also called as | - | Lumix DMC-FZ2000 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2012-07-16 | 2016-09-19 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5472 x 3648 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Max enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 125 |
RAW data | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 49 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 24-480mm (20.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/2.8-4.5 |
Macro focus range | 4cm | 3cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Display size | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 921k dots | 1,040k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display technology | TFT-LCD with Anti-reflection coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 30 secs | 60 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Fastest quiet shutter speed | - | 1/16000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 6.9 frames/s | 12.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | - | 13.20 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow-sync | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync, Slow Sync/Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720p (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) | 4096 x 2060 @ 24p / 100 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 4096x2160 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 215g (0.47 pounds) | 915g (2.02 pounds) |
Dimensions | 109 x 62 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 138 x 102 x 135mm (5.4" x 4.0" x 5.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 70 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.0 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.6 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 538 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 200 images | 350 images |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | EN-EL12 | DMW-BLC12 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at release | $249 | $998 |